Skip to content

Conversation

@jedcunningham
Copy link
Member

We do not want the staging links in our RC assets, since we copy those assets over as-is when the vote has passed.

PR #55677 incorrectly assumed there were separate production and RC builds.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes (please specify the tool below)

Generated-by: Cursor CLI (Claude Opus 4.5)

We do _not_ want the staging links in our RC assets, since we copy those
assets over as-is when the vote has passed.

PR apache#55677 incorrectly assumed there were separate production and RC
builds.
@jedcunningham jedcunningham merged commit f08b40c into apache:main Feb 1, 2026
71 checks passed
@jedcunningham jedcunningham deleted the fix_helm_release branch February 1, 2026 07:17
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2026

Backport failed to create: v3-1-test. View the failure log Run details

Status Branch Result
v3-1-test Commit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker f08b40c v3-1-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-1-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

jedcunningham added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2026
Turns out the VERSION_SUFFIX env var is used as the default for the
--version-suffix flag, and we do not want it set when we are preparing
the package.

More permanent fix coming soon, but this unblocks PMC verification for
1.19.0rc2.

Related: apache#61303
jedcunningham added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2026
Turns out the VERSION_SUFFIX env var is used as the default for the
--version-suffix flag, and we do not want it set when we are preparing
the package.

More permanent fix coming soon, but this unblocks PMC verification for
1.19.0rc2.

Related: #61303
Copy link
Contributor

@jscheffl jscheffl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, needed to get to bed early yesterday, thanks for taking care!

Yeah as in your email in devlist I also thought as changed here is "right". Looking forward for RC2 whereas other than documentation links I assume no surprises.

@bugraoz93
Copy link
Contributor

This was the first thing I suspected too, but wasn't fully sure if the release process is different than others on that point. Great to know! Thanks Jed!
#61294 (comment)

PS: Even we don't need backport since we are releasing from main but would be good to align the docs just in case on the fixed part. Will check it out if no one has disagreement on that. Of course you can raise on PR too

@jscheffl jscheffl removed the backport-to-v3-1-test Mark PR with this label to backport to v3-1-test branch label Feb 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants