Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v2.0: replay: do not refresh votes for hot spare validators (backport of #2770) #2779

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Problem

Hot spares will attempt to refresh votes even though the identity keypair check will fail.
This results in a large amount of log spam.

Summary of Changes

solana-labs#34737 (comment) creates a distinction between failed vote generation and non-voting validators.
Add an additional case for hot spare validators and exclude them from the refresh vote check as well.

Contributes to #2768


This is an automatic backport of pull request #2770 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2024 21:45
@AshwinSekar
Copy link

this reduces log spam observed on hotspares, no functional changes:
https://discord.com/channels/428295358100013066/560174212967432193/1278376793455202418

@t-nelson
Copy link

seems unlikely that the downstream build failure is actually caused by this change. may need a rebase after some other fix though

@AshwinSekar
Copy link

seems unlikely that the downstream build failure is actually caused by this change. may need a rebase after some other fix though

reran it and checks are now passing 🤷

@AshwinSekar AshwinSekar merged commit 3853b5d into v2.0 Aug 29, 2024
38 checks passed
@AshwinSekar AshwinSekar deleted the mergify/bp/v2.0/pr-2770 branch August 29, 2024 22:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants