Description
extends #109
你好！上次关于#109的这个bug，后来被整改了。
Bug描述
但是整改得并不正确.....经我测试，仅限于异常比例小于1的情况下正确。
但是当抛出的异常比例为100%时，设定的阈值小于1，此时会出现DegradeException，但是服务不会进入timeWindow被隔离。
举个栗子
同样以com.alibaba.csp.sentinel.demo.degrade.ExceptionRatioDegradeDemo这个Demo为例，直接设定每次都抛出异常，结果如下（不知怎么上传图片，直接copy过来了）：
Connected to the target VM, address: '127.0.0.1:51393', transport: 'socket' begin to statistic!!! 1536131534343, oneSecondTotal:34, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:29, oneSecondBizException:5 1536131535345, oneSecondTotal:49, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:44, oneSecondBizException:5 1536131536345, oneSecondTotal:48, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:43, oneSecondBizException:5 1536131537344, oneSecondTotal:48, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:43, oneSecondBizException:5 1536131538346, oneSecondTotal:49, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:44, oneSecondBizException:5 1536131539346, oneSecondTotal:48, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:43, oneSecondBizException:5 1536131540346, oneSecondTotal:48, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:43, oneSecondBizException:5 1536131541348, oneSecondTotal:49, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:44, oneSecondBizException:5 1536131542348, oneSecondTotal:48, oneSecondPass:5, oneSecondBlock:43, oneSecondBizException:5
整改措施
问题还是出在：com.alibaba.csp.sentinel.slots.block.degrade.DegradeRule的passCheck方法中，在原来的Fixed处：commit 6799da2
double realSuccess = success - exception; //186
if (realSuccess <= 0) { //187
return exception < RT_MAX_EXCEED_N;
}
不应该修改，还是应该保留原来的代码：
if (success <= 0) {
return exception < RT_MAX_EXCEED_N;
}
请确认...