Skip to content

Conversation

@tsachiherman
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This refactoring would eliminate the need to change the maxPaysetHint while we modify the block size.

Test Plan

Use existing tests.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 29, 2021

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.80%. Comparing base (465c191) to head (76225ef).
Report is 2088 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3162      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.80%   43.80%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         391      391              
  Lines       86880    86881       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        38062    38058       -4     
- Misses      42786    42790       +4     
- Partials     6032     6033       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tsachiherman tsachiherman requested a review from algobarb October 29, 2021 15:40
@tsachiherman tsachiherman requested a review from algobarb October 29, 2021 16:20
@tsachiherman tsachiherman merged commit b8ac4ba into algorand:master Oct 29, 2021
@tsachiherman tsachiherman deleted the tsachi/refactorMaxPaysetHint branch October 29, 2021 17:50
cce pushed a commit to cce/go-algorand that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2021
…#3162)

## Summary

This refactoring would eliminate the need to change the maxPaysetHint while we modify the block size.

## Test Plan

Use existing tests.
@egieseke egieseke mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants