Adding to Freetype windows role

[cwesMills]

JDK8 compile will fail unless freetype is built beforehand, so these changes
will build freetype 32bit and 64bit versions inside C:\openjdk\freetype-2.5.3
Fixes #367
Signed-off-by: Colton Mills millscolt3@gmail.com

[jdekonin]

Looks good to me. I am a little concerned over the fact that the 64bit versions are in fact 32bit. Although building JDK8 or JDK11, it seems not to matter.

[karianna]

How are the 64bit versions actually 32bit? That would probably be an issue. Is this change to support OpenJ9 builds only? I'd probably get @ali-ince and @johnoliver to review this as well if the builds are relying on this...

[jdekonin]

Its a requirement for openjdk as I understand it. Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0 is 32bit only. @cwesMills could you test compiling these like you did with the OpenSSL role using Microsoft Visual Studio 12 which has for 32 & 64 bit support?

[cwesMills]

Visual Studio 12 gives the same result. When running file lib32/freetype.dll, the output is lib32/freetype.dll: PE32 executable (DLL) (GUI) Intel 80386, for MS Windows, and file lib64/freetype.dll outputs lib64/freetype.dll: PE32+ executable (DLL) (GUI) x86-64, for MS Windows. It also seems we have the same problem with the OpenSSL install.

[cwesMills]

It turns out the PE32+ executable is actually 64bit, we were just confused by the naming convention.

[jdekonin]

Okay, I'm good with this solution.

[sxa]

Since this was all based on my issue I can't really object, therefore approving too ;-)