-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pbTests: Update Vagrantfile paths in VPC/vmDestroy #2216
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving subject to the VPC run passing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, not approving as I've got one change to add some quotes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - I should have scanned for this last time
@karianna Still not working yet as per the VPC link in the description :-) |
Better - the build is succeeding on the Linux platforms but tests are failing:
Windows playbook failed on one of the roles so that's unrelated to this I think |
Rebased (to include the fix to the test repository location) and retesting at https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Tooling/job/VagrantPlaybookCheck/1193/ |
Looking better so I'm going to take this out of draft and approve/merge. Notes:
|
Looking better so I'm going to take this out of draft. Notes:
Neither of those two failures should prevent this going in, but the Solaris one will need a resolution (Since VPC was broken that one got merged without being tested by VPC) |
I'm going to merge this. Please @gdams @karianna can we be careful about making and merging changes going in and make sure things are tested in a selection of environments first. We can't just chuck things into the repo and especially not ignore the side-effects in the future. I'm going to get much tougher on this even if it mandates having a longer review process because we can't allow checks broken for weeks. The right course of action here would have been to merge the revert PR and wait until it could be merged without any problems. Obviously we still have the Solaris issue as mentioned in the previous comment. Much as we have survived without them in the past and I'd prefer not to have to enforce extra bureacracy, if things like this occur then we will need to start expediting the introduction of some of the processes described in AdoptOpenJDK/TSC#220 |
Fixes: #2215
VPC currently isn't running cleanly, due to a new issue with
vmDestroy.sh
. While I can't see that it's related to #2211 ,vpc.sh
, it suddenly started being an issue after this was merged. Irrespective,vpc.sh
needs to be updated to reflect the changes in that PR anyway.Keeping in Draft until VPC runs are (mostly) green:
https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Tooling/job/VagrantPlaybookCheck/1183/
Checklist