-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
Try enabling paragraphs to be added to contentOnly patterns #73222
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f41cf5e
Try enabling paragraphs to be added to contentOnly patterns
tellthemachines fbde505
Add block order to selector memoization
talldan 79075fe
Update selectors to allow paragraph removal for disabled parents
talldan 650c970
Fix inserting paragraphs after headings
talldan e7ea924
Disallow removing the last paragraph
talldan c4ca620
Fix unit tests
talldan 49f7699
Disallow insertion into synced patterns
talldan bfd4ccc
Disallow removal from synced patterns
talldan 13503ec
Fix synced pattern logic to consider parents and ancestors that might…
talldan 63317a4
Fix unit tests again
talldan 0566ee5
Fix e2e tests for templateLock: contentOnly
talldan 77dc202
Avoid hard-coding paragraph block name
talldan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a blocker IMO but this doesn't check that the other paragraph blocks are adjacent to the paragraph in question. It simply ensures there's at least 2 default blocks anywhere in the existingBlocks.
I reckon let's see how this change feels in practice, and whether this could use tweaking in follow-ups.