-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 450
fix: NetworkTransform rotation delta check false positives #1890
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
NoelStephensUnity
merged 16 commits into
develop
from
fix/mtt-3370-networktransform-delta-rotation-check
Apr 21, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3159957
fix
NoelStephensUnity 1ba437f
test
NoelStephensUnity b78a880
style
NoelStephensUnity 6e82f79
Update CHANGELOG.md
NoelStephensUnity a8915dc
Update CHANGELOG.md
NoelStephensUnity d78be60
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/mtt-3370-networktransform-delta-rotat…
NoelStephensUnity 4c01165
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/mtt-3370-networktransform-delta-rotat…
NoelStephensUnity 846c95c
fix
NoelStephensUnity d783740
Merge branch 'fix/mtt-3370-networktransform-delta-rotation-check' of …
NoelStephensUnity 1f666f4
style
NoelStephensUnity cded1ba
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/mtt-3370-networktransform-delta-rotat…
NoelStephensUnity 950cbfc
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/mtt-3370-networktransform-delta-rotat…
NoelStephensUnity 6eca0f8
test fix
NoelStephensUnity f9c23f6
update
NoelStephensUnity b8d64d6
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/mtt-3370-networktransform-delta-rotat…
NoelStephensUnity da9686f
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/mtt-3370-networktransform-delta-rotat…
NoelStephensUnity File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this is following the paradigm but at this point, should this mega-tuple be turned into a struct? The tuple signature is replicated at least 3 times in this file, and with this internal API you're exposing the tuple to outside classes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah... I know... :(
I am trying to be very selective about what I am changing in these PRs...actually this PR is only a portion of #1846 just so I can get this rotation fix in without any other changes blocking this (a higher priority fix).
@ThusWroteNomad What do you think? Switch that to a struct in this PR or make that a separate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think a nice and simple separate PR proposing tuple -> struct would be great :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, once this gets merged I will whip up a quick PR for that.