Skip to content

fix: unet removed from unity trunk #1678

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 11, 2022

Conversation

NoelStephensUnity
Copy link
Collaborator

@NoelStephensUnity NoelStephensUnity commented Feb 11, 2022

Fixing the most recent update to unity trunk where UNet no longer exists.
MTT-2483

Testing and Documentation

  • No tests were included
  • No documentation changes or additions were necessary.

Updating the NGO assembly.
excluding unet if it is not present.
@NoelStephensUnity NoelStephensUnity marked this pull request as draft February 11, 2022 02:42
@NoelStephensUnity NoelStephensUnity marked this pull request as ready for review February 11, 2022 03:16
Missed a few spots
CommandLineHandler had references to UNetTransport
Excluding Unity.Netcode.Transports.UNET from NetworkManagerHelper.
@simon-lemay-unity
Copy link
Contributor

Shouldn't this be marked for backporting to 1.0.0? There already are bug reports about this. Depending on how fast you guys plan on making UTP the default, you might want to make a release with this fix...

In any case, if it is possible that users will use this fix before UTP is the default, it might be a good idea to indicate in one way or another that they should install the UTP adapter. Otherwise they'll just be faced with a netcode solution that doesn't include a transport.

NoelStephensUnity and others added 2 commits February 11, 2022 09:53
removing commented out UNet references and adding additional comments.
removing the relay stuff as it was not needed.
Adding UnityTransport support to the CommandLineHandler.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants