Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix partition live number not register #34842

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023
Merged

[BugFix] Fix partition live number not register #34842

merged 14 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

Astralidea
Copy link
Contributor

@Astralidea Astralidea commented Nov 13, 2023

Why I'm doing:
Creating the table first and then changing the partition_live_number attribute does not take effect.
What I'm doing:
This is caused by not registering the schedule info in DynamicPartitionScheduler when modifying the properties. Adding this schedule info when modifying partition_live_number can solve the problem.

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
@imay
Copy link
Contributor

imay commented Nov 13, 2023

@Astralidea

What I'm doing:
fix this problem.

Actually, what others expect is how you fixed the issue not just the result. Then they can review your code with the understanding of what you have done.

@nshangyiming nshangyiming self-requested a review November 13, 2023 19:35
@nshangyiming nshangyiming self-assigned this Nov 13, 2023
Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
@Astralidea Astralidea enabled auto-merge (squash) November 14, 2023 11:01
@nshangyiming nshangyiming enabled auto-merge (squash) November 15, 2023 04:25
Copy link
Contributor

@nshangyiming nshangyiming left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

few comments

}

ModifyTablePropertyOperationLog info =
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why write multi edit log instead of only one?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because this can only support one log and one process.

Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 9 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

warning The version of Java (11.0.21) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17.
Read more here

Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 60 / 60 (100.00%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/server/LocalMetastore.java 55 55 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/clone/DynamicPartitionScheduler.java 5 5 100.00% []

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

@nshangyiming nshangyiming merged commit 035e033 into StarRocks:main Nov 16, 2023
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.2 label Nov 16, 2023
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.1 label Nov 16, 2023
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.0

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 16, 2023

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.0 label Nov 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 16, 2023

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 16, 2023

backport branch-3.0

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Why I'm doing:
Creating the table first and then changing the partition_live_number attribute does not take effect.
What I'm doing:
This is caused by not registering the schedule info in DynamicPartitionScheduler when modifying the properties. Adding this schedule info when modifying partition_live_number can solve the problem.

Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
(cherry picked from commit 035e033)

# Conflicts:
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/server/LocalMetastore.java
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Why I'm doing:
Creating the table first and then changing the partition_live_number attribute does not take effect.
What I'm doing:
This is caused by not registering the schedule info in DynamicPartitionScheduler when modifying the properties. Adding this schedule info when modifying partition_live_number can solve the problem.

Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
(cherry picked from commit 035e033)

# Conflicts:
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/server/LocalMetastore.java
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Why I'm doing:
Creating the table first and then changing the partition_live_number attribute does not take effect.
What I'm doing:
This is caused by not registering the schedule info in DynamicPartitionScheduler when modifying the properties. Adding this schedule info when modifying partition_live_number can solve the problem.

Signed-off-by: Astralidea <astralidea@163.com>
(cherry picked from commit 035e033)

# Conflicts:
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/server/LocalMetastore.java
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants