Skip to content

Conversation

isaacroldan
Copy link
Contributor

@isaacroldan isaacroldan commented Sep 25, 2025

WHY are these changes introduced?

Clean up unnecessary awaits

WHAT is this pull request doing?

  • Removes all await keywords when calling normalizeStoreFqdn

How to test your changes?

  1. Nothing to test, just that CI passes

Measuring impact

How do we know this change was effective? Please choose one:

  • n/a - this doesn't need measurement, e.g. a linting rule or a bug-fix

Checklist

  • I've considered possible cross-platform impacts (Mac, Linux, Windows)
  • I've considered possible documentation changes

Copy link
Contributor Author

isaacroldan commented Sep 25, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@isaacroldan isaacroldan marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2025 09:59
@isaacroldan isaacroldan requested review from a team as code owners September 25, 2025 09:59
Copy link
Contributor

We detected some changes at packages/*/src and there are no updates in the .changeset.
If the changes are user-facing, run pnpm changeset add to track your changes and include them in the next release CHANGELOG.

Caution

DO NOT create changesets for features which you do not wish to be included in the public changelog of the next CLI release.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
78.95% (+0.15% 🔼)
13308/16856
🟡 Branches
72.63% (-0.04% 🔻)
6497/8945
🟡 Functions
79.15% (+0.33% 🔼)
3440/4346
🟡 Lines
79.31% (+0.17% 🔼)
12570/15850
Show new covered files 🐣
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟡
... / type-generation.ts
71% 52.05% 88.89% 70.71%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / ui_extension.ts
94.78% (-1.3% 🔻)
82.89% (-5.51% 🔻)
100%
96.43% (-1.53% 🔻)
🟢
... / extension.ts
91.11% (+0.58% 🔼)
74% (-0.07% 🔻)
91.67% (-0.33% 🔻)
90.91% (+0.59% 🔼)
🟢
... / conf-store.ts
100%
82.22% (-2.22% 🔻)
100% 100%
🔴
... / environment.ts
40% (-5% 🔻)
41.18%
50% (-10% 🔻)
42.11% (-5.26% 🔻)

Test suite run success

3228 tests passing in 1336 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 0f7021c

Copy link
Contributor

@plvaldes plvaldes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

There are some warning from ESLint Report Analysis, but not sure they are relevant

@isaacroldan isaacroldan force-pushed the 09-25-remove_unnecessary_awaits branch from 5745cc2 to 0f7021c Compare October 3, 2025 09:31
@isaacroldan isaacroldan force-pushed the 09-25-fix_dev_stores_with_custom_domains branch from c79edca to ccbd42a Compare October 3, 2025 09:31
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Differences in type declarations

We detected differences in the type declarations generated by Typescript for this branch compared to the baseline ('main' branch). Please, review them to ensure they are backward-compatible. Here are some important things to keep in mind:

  • Some seemingly private modules might be re-exported through public modules.
  • If the branch is behind main you might see odd diffs, rebase main into this branch.

New type declarations

We found no new type declarations in this PR

Existing type declarations

packages/cli-kit/dist/public/node/context/fqdn.d.ts
@@ -50,4 +50,4 @@ export declare function identityFqdn(): Promise<string>;
  * @param store - Store name.
  * @returns Normalized store name.
  */
-export declare function normalizeStoreFqdn(store: string): Promise<string>;
\ No newline at end of file
+export declare function normalizeStoreFqdn(store: string): string;
\ No newline at end of file

Base automatically changed from 09-25-fix_dev_stores_with_custom_domains to main October 3, 2025 09:46
@isaacroldan isaacroldan added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 3, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants