-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pkg/nanocbor: Bump to latest commit #19975
Conversation
Important changes: - Add stream-like interface for encoder - Separate functions for number of items left in arrays and maps
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still works with the thingy I am working on (and also the tests/pkg/nanocbor
tests on native
).
bors merge |
19975: pkg/nanocbor: Bump to latest commit r=miri64 a=bergzand ### Contribution description Not much to see here Important changes: - Add stream-like interface for encoder - Separate functions for number of items left in arrays and maps ### Testing procedure The usual test should still work ### Issues/PRs references None Co-authored-by: Koen Zandberg <koen@bergzand.net>
Build failed:
|
bors merge |
Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
19988: pkg/nanocbor: Update for fixed nanocbor_skip_simple() [backport 2023.10] r=MrKevinWeiss a=bergzand # backport of #19975 and #19983 ### Contribution description Manually created the backport this time 😢 Includes both #19975 and #19983 to include the nanocbor bug fix for the `nanocbor_skip_simple()` function ### Testing procedure The usual nanocbor test in `tests/pkg/nanocbor` ### Issues/PRs references None Co-authored-by: Koen Zandberg <koen@bergzand.net>
Contribution description
Not much to see here
Important changes:
Testing procedure
The usual test should still work
Issues/PRs references
None