Skip to content

Regex bug fixes, refactoring (macroization) and code improvments #20918

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Mar 13, 2023

Conversation

demerphq
Copy link
Collaborator

@demerphq demerphq commented Mar 9, 2023

This PR sequence includes the non-controversial parts of #20677 and #20747.

It includes multiple clean up patches, regex engine bug fixes, and other improvements, including an important patch to simplify and standardize the structures we use to represent regexp opcodes (regops).

It does not include the controversial parts of the above PR's: neither the start_new/end_new pairing, nor the creation of an RXMO object (intended to separate out the compiled form of a regex from the results from that form). It does include many changes which are intended to facilitate the latter, such as wrapping the various regex structure accessors in macros so that they can be used to "hide" the split in the future.

The patch marked "regexec.c - incredibly inefficient solution to backref problem" and its much more efficient successor "regexec.c - make REF into a backtracking state" fixes #10073 - RT72020

The patch marked "regexec.c - teach BRANCH and BRANCHJ nodes to reset capture buffers" adds tests and todo tests for #18865

The patch marked "regcomp.c - track parens related to CURLYX and CURLYM" includes prep work for tracking how parens are before and within a quantified group, and tests for various bug reports we have related to inconsistencies between CURLYM and CURLYX.

This PR either fixes or contains preparation to fix the following bugs: #20661, #19615, #18865, #14848, #13619, #10073, #8267

I would like to get this merged soon so that i can rebase the other two branches on top. @iabyn and I have been in correspondance about the changes in #20677 and for now I would like to move forward with most, but not all of that PR, this PR excludes the parts which @iabyn found to be controversial. I believe that nothing left in this PR is or should be controversial.

Copy link
Contributor

@khwilliamson khwilliamson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The two commits that mention fix up should be squashed. I thought I was commenting on individual commits, but things showed up here.

Copy link
Contributor

@khwilliamson khwilliamson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typos in commit message

This patch is very crude. It simple pushes the state of the parens and creates
and unwind point
should be 'simply'
and should be 'an'

@khwilliamson
Copy link
Contributor

I spent an hour-ish looking at this. The changes to the parts of the engine I'm familiar with look reasonable. I have never spent much time looking at the engine execution stack. Everything looks plausible, so I think this can be merged.

rex->maxlen holds the maximum length the pattern can match, not the
minimum. The copy was obviously copied from the rex->minlen case,
so fix it to be correct.
…th ampersand

Tests with $& always pass in regexp_noamp.t (wrapper around regexp.t),
so when they are TODO tests it looks like a TODO pass when in fact it is
just an artifact of how we handle ampersand tests in this file. For these
cases we simply do not mark them as TODO anymore
This was originally a patch which made somewhat drastic changes to how
we represent capture buffers, which Dave M and I and are still
discussing offline and which has a larger impact than is acceptable to
address at the current time. As such I have reverted the controversial
parts of this patch for now, while keeping most of it intact even if in
some cases the changes are unused except for debugging purposes.

This patch still contains valuable changes, for instance teaching CURLYX
and CURLYM about how many parens there are before the curly[1] (which
will be useful in follow up patches even if stricly speaking they are
not directly used yet), tests and other cleanups. Also this patch is
sufficiently large that reverting it out would have a large effect on
the patches that were made on top of it.

Thus keeping most of this patch while eliminating the controversial
parts of it for now seemed the best approach, especially as some of the
changes it introduces and the follow up patches based on it are very
useful in cleaning up the structures we use to represent regops.

[1] Curly is the regexp internals term for quantifiers, named after
x{min,max} "curly brace" quantifiers.
In /((a)(b)|(a))+/ we should not end up with $2 and $4 being set at
the same time. When a branch fails it should reset any capture buffers
that might be touched by its branch.

We change BRANCH and BRANCHJ to store the number of parens before the
branch, and the number of parens after the branch was completed. When
a BRANCH operation fails, we clear the buffers it contains before we
continue on.

It is a bit more complex than it should be because we have BRANCHJ
and BRANCH. (One of these days we should merge them together.)

This is also made somewhat more complex because TRIE nodes are actually
branches, and may need to track capture buffers also, at two levels.
The overall TRIE op, and for jump tries especially where we emulate
the behavior of branches. So we have to do the same clearing logic if
a trie branch fails as well.
@demerphq demerphq force-pushed the yves/redo_curlyx_curlym branch from 8cd2da2 to 98a9b34 Compare March 13, 2023 08:31
demerphq added 16 commits March 13, 2023 10:14
Backrefs to unclosed parens inside of a quantified group were not being
properly handled, which revealed we are not unrolling the paren state properly
on failure and backtracking.

Much of the code assumes that when we execute a "conditional" operation (where
more than one thing could match) that we need not concern ourself with the
paren state unless the conditional operation itself represents a paren, and
that generally opcodes only needed to concern themselves with parens to their
right. When you exclude backrefs from the equation this is broadly reasonable
(i think), as on failure we typically dont care about the state of the paren
buffers. They either get reset as we find a new different accepting pathway,
or their state is irrelevant if the overal match is rejected (eg it fails).

However backreferences are different. Consider the following pattern
from the tests

    "xa=xaaa" =~ /^(xa|=?\1a){2}\z/

in the first iteration through this the first branch matches, and in fact
because the \1 is in the second branch it can't match on the first iteration
at all. After this $1 = "xa". We then perform the second iteration. "xa" does
not match "=xaaa" so we fall to the second branch. The '=?' matches, but sets
up a backtracking action to not match if the rest of the pattern does not
match. \1 matches 'xa', and then the 'a' matches, leaving an unmatched 'a' in
the string, we exit the quantifier loop with $1 = "=xaa" and match \z against
the remaining "a" in the pattern, and fail.

Here is where things go wrong in the old code, we unwind to the outer loop,
but we do not unwind the paren state. We then unwind further into the 2nds
iteration of the loop, to the '=?' where we then try to match the tail with
the quantifier matching the empty string. We then match the old $1 (which was
not unwound) as "=xaa", and then the "a" matches, and we are the end of the
string and we have incorrectly accpeted this string as matching the pattern.

What should have happend was when the \1 was resolved the second time it
should have returned the same string as it did when the =? matched '=', which
then would have resulted in the tail matching again, and etc, eventually
unwinding the entire pattern when the second iteration failed entirely.

This patch is very crude. It simply pushes the state of the parens and creates
an unwind point for every case where we do a transition to a B or _next
operation, and we make the corresponding _next_fail do the appropriate
unwinding. The objective was to achieve correctness and then work towards
making it more efficient. We almost certainly overstore items on the stack.

In the next patch we will keep track of the unclosed parens before the
relevant operators and make sure that they are properly pushed and
unwound at the correct times. In other words this is a first step patch
to make sure things are correct, the next patch will change it so we do
it quickly.
This way we can do the required paren restoration only when it is in use. When
we match a REF type node which is potentially a reference to an unclosed paren
we push the match context information, currently for "everything", but in a
future patch we can teach it to be more efficient by adding a new parameter to
the REF regop to track which parens it should save.

This converts the backtracking changes from the previous commit, so that it is
run only when specifically enabled via the define RE_PESSIMISTIC_PARENS which
is by default 0. We don't make the new fields in the struct conditional as the
stack frames are large and our changes don't make any real difference and it
keeps things simpler to not have conditional members, especially since some of
the structures have to line up with each other.

If enabling RE_PESSIMISTIC_PARENS fixes a backtracking bug then it means
something is sensitive to us not necessarily restoring the parens properly on
failure. We make some assumptions that the paren state after a failing state
will be corrected by a future successful state, or that the state of the
parens is irrelevant as we will fail anyway. This can be made not true by
EVAL, backrefs, and potentially some other scenarios. Thus I have left this
inefficient logic in place but guarded by the flag.
This eliminates the regnode_2L data structure, and merges it with the older
regnode_2 data structure. At the same time it makes each "arg" property of the
various regnode types that have one be consistently structured as an anonymous
union like this:

    union {
        U32 arg1u;
        I32 arg2i;
        struct {
            U16 arg1a;
            U16 arg1b;
        };
    };

We then expose four macros for accessing each slot: ARG1u() ARG1i() and
ARG1a() and ARG1b(). Code then explicitly designates which they want. The old
logic used ARG() to access an U32 arg1, and ARG1() to access an I32 arg1,
which was confusing to say the least. The regnode_2L structure had a U32 arg1,
and I32 arg2, and the regnode_2 data strucutre had two I32 args. With the new
set of macros we use the regnode_2 for both, and use the appropriate macros to
show whether we want to signed or unsigned values.

This also renames the regnode_4 to regnode_3. The 3 stands for "three 32-bit
args". However as each slot can also store two U16s, a regnode_3 can hold up
to 6 U16s, or as 3 I32's, or a combination. For instance the CURLY style nodes
use regnode_3 to store 4 values, ARG1i() for min count, ARG2i() for max count
and ARG3a() and ARG3b() for parens before and inside the quantifier.

It also changes the functions reganode() to reg1node() and changes reg2Lanode()
to reg2node(). The 2L thing was just confusing.
this way we can avoid pushing every buffer, we only need to push
the nestroot of the ref.
This insulates access to the regexp match offset data so we can
fix the define later and move the offset structure into a new struct.

The RXp_OFFSp() was introduced in a recent commit to deliberately
break anything using RXp_OFFS() directly. It is hard to type
deliberately, nothing but the internals should use it. Everything
else should use one of the wrappers around it.
Obviously this isn't required as we build fine. But doing this
future proofs us to other changes.
This field will be moving to a new struct. Converting this to a macro
will make that move easier.
We were missing various RXp_XXXX() and RX_XXXX() macros. This adds
them so we can use them in places where we are unreasonable intimate
with the regexp struct internals.
We will move some of these members out of the regexp structure
into a new sub structucture. This isolates those changes to the
macro definitions
We will move this struct member into a new struct in a future patch,
and using the macros means we can reduce the number of places that
needs to be explcitly aware of the new structure.
We will move this member to a new struct in the near future,
converting all uses to a macro isolates that change.
This member of the regexp structure will be moved to a new
structure in the near future. Converting to use the macro
will make this change easier to manage.
We will migrate this struct member to a new struct in the near future
this change will make that patch more minimal and hide the gory details.
This member of the regexp struct will soon be migrated to a new
independent structure. This change ensure that when we do the migration
the changes are restricted to the least code possible.
We will migrate this member to a new structure in the near future,
wrapping with a macro makes that migration simpler and less invasive.
We will move various members of the regexp structure to a new
structure which just contains information about the match. Wrapping
the members in the standard macros means that change can be made
less invasive. We already did all of this in regexec.c
@demerphq demerphq force-pushed the yves/redo_curlyx_curlym branch from 98a9b34 to e9a6ab1 Compare March 13, 2023 09:16
@demerphq
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@khwilliamson fixups applied. Thanks for the review.

@demerphq demerphq merged commit 6b6b368 into blead Mar 13, 2023
@demerphq demerphq deleted the yves/redo_curlyx_curlym branch March 13, 2023 13:26
@iabyn
Copy link
Contributor

iabyn commented Mar 17, 2023 via email

@demerphq
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sorry, I'm a bit late with a code review. In short, it looks fine, but with the following niggles, listed by commit title. [By fine, I mostly mean the runtime parts - I'm just assuming the regcomp.c parts are ok too because I'm scared of anything in that file.]

See #20940 which addresses the issues you have raised here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Recursive back references do not always work
3 participants