Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update TS #2339

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Update TS #2339

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

CHIRANTH-24
Copy link

@CHIRANTH-24 CHIRANTH-24 commented Oct 17, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Upgrade version

Issue Number:

Fixes #2334

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Snapshots/Videos:

None
If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Upgraded typscript version from 5.6.2 to 5.6.3 in package.json file

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

None

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated TypeScript dependency to version 5.6.3 for improved performance and stability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves an update to the package.json file for the talawa-admin project, specifically incrementing the version of the typescript package from ^5.6.2 to ^5.6.3. This change is a minor version update, and no other dependencies were altered. The overall structure of the package.json file remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated typescript version from ^5.6.2 to ^5.6.3

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Upgrade package typescript from 5.6.2 to 5.6.3 (#2334)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

  • eslint-plugin-jest upgraded #2261: This PR also involves updates to the package.json file related to TypeScript dependencies, making it relevant to the current changes.

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

🐰 "In the garden where code does bloom,
A version updated, dispelling the gloom.
TypeScript now shines, a minor delight,
Hop along, let’s code through the night!" 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

Line range hint 1-185: Consider a broader dependency review and potential updates.

While updating TypeScript is a good step, it might be beneficial to review and potentially update other dependencies as well. This could help prevent future conflicts and ensure you're using the latest features and security patches.

Here are some suggestions:

  1. Review and potentially update React-related dependencies, especially if they have TypeScript typings that might benefit from the latest TypeScript version.

  2. Check for any outdated or vulnerable dependencies using npm audit and npm outdated.

  3. Consider standardizing version constraints across dependencies for consistency and easier maintenance.

  4. Review the resolutions section to see if the manual resolutions are still necessary with the updated TypeScript version.

You can use the following commands to assist with this review:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for outdated packages
npm outdated

# Run security audit
npm audit

# List installed package versions
npm ls

After running these commands, assess if any other dependencies need updating alongside TypeScript.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 025bc1d and 35f327a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

61-61: LGTM! TypeScript version updated as intended.

The TypeScript version has been successfully updated from 5.6.2 to 5.6.3 as per the PR objectives. This minor version update is unlikely to introduce breaking changes.

To ensure this update resolves the previously failed tests and doesn't require any additional changes, please:

  1. Run the test suite to verify that the previously failing tests now pass.
  2. Check if any TypeScript configuration files (e.g., tsconfig.json) need updates to align with the new version.

You can use the following commands to verify:

If all tests pass and there are no TypeScript errors, this update should be good to go.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.62%. Comparing base (025bc1d) to head (35f327a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2339   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.62%   97.62%           
========================================
  Files          250      250           
  Lines         7188     7188           
  Branches      2069     2069           
========================================
  Hits          7017     7017           
  Misses         159      159           
  Partials        12       12           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 7496bb3 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop Oct 17, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants