Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove outdated comment in ERC-20 #4968

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

alexfertel
Copy link
Contributor

Missed this other outdated comment in #4964

@alexfertel alexfertel added documentation Inline comments, guides, and examples. ignore-changeset labels Mar 21, 2024
@alexfertel alexfertel requested review from Amxx and ernestognw March 21, 2024 10:05
@alexfertel alexfertel self-assigned this Mar 21, 2024
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 21, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f034421

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Member

@ernestognw ernestognw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On a side note, I was reviewing to make sure we're not missing something again in the docs, and turns out we're still warning users about approve frontrunning when we already deprecated the non-standard increaseAllowance and decreaseAllowance functions.

* IMPORTANT: Beware that changing an allowance with this method brings the risk
* that someone may use both the old and the new allowance by unfortunate
* transaction ordering. One possible solution to mitigate this race
* condition is to first reduce the spender's allowance to 0 and set the
* desired value afterwards:
* https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729

I wonder if we should remove the warning. We agree is a theoretical issue but doesn't hurt anyone 🤔

contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ernestognw
Copy link
Member

The xref doesn't look good in the docs. Taking some time to test it in local

Copy link
Member

@ernestognw ernestognw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Merging if CI pass

@alexfertel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you!

@Amxx Amxx merged commit e203e02 into OpenZeppelin:master Mar 21, 2024
18 checks passed
@ernestognw
Copy link
Member

Testing @gitpoap-bot @alexfertel

Copy link

gitpoap-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2024

Congrats, @alexfertel ! You've earned a GitPOAP for your contribution!

GitPOAP: 2024 OpenZeppelin Contracts Contributor:

GitPOAP: 2024 OpenZeppelin Contracts Contributor GitPOAP Badge

Head to gitpoap.io & connect your GitHub account to mint!

Learn more about GitPOAPs here.

@alexfertel alexfertel deleted the outdated-comment-2 branch April 18, 2024 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Inline comments, guides, and examples. ignore-changeset
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants