Skip to content

Conversation

@pinebit
Copy link
Collaborator

@pinebit pinebit commented Dec 12, 2025

Fixed and improving of tracing data production.

category: refactor
ticket: none

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 68.62745% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 56.35%. Comparing base (1c29397) to head (6b24b7a).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
core/validatorapi/validatorapi.go 70.58% 10 Missing ⚠️
core/consensus/qbft/qbft.go 33.33% 5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4169      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.29%   56.35%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         245      245              
  Lines       31246    31288      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        17591    17632      +41     
+ Misses      11337    11336       -1     
- Partials     2318     2320       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

duty := core.NewAttesterDuty(uint64(opts.Slot))
ctx, span = core.StartDutyTrace(ctx, duty, "core/validatorapi.AttestationData")

span.SetAttributes(attribute.Int64("committee_index", int64(opts.CommitteeIndex)))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This here we expect it to be always 0 if fetch_only_commidx_0 is turned on which is the majority now. It will also be made default in the upcoming months. Not sure if we need that attribute.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It shall not hurt, especially if it is not zero, suddenly :) this way we can always confirm it is zero

@pinebit pinebit added the merge when ready Indicates bulldozer bot may merge when all checks pass label Dec 12, 2025
@obol-bulldozer obol-bulldozer bot merged commit 456de3f into main Dec 12, 2025
12 checks passed
@obol-bulldozer obol-bulldozer bot deleted the pinebit/better-tracing branch December 12, 2025 12:51
DiogoSantoss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
Fixed and improving of tracing data production.

category: refactor
ticket: none
obol-bulldozer bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
Cherry picking #4169 and #4170

category: misc
ticket: none
DiogoSantoss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
Fixed and improving of tracing data production.

category: refactor
ticket: none
obol-bulldozer bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
Cherry picking #4169 and #4170

category: misc
ticket: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merge when ready Indicates bulldozer bot may merge when all checks pass

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants