Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename one further kernel method #1616

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lgoettgens
Copy link
Collaborator

I suppose this was missed in #1601.

cc @joschmitt @thofma

@joschmitt
Copy link
Collaborator

Well, missed in the sense that the signature is not replaced. I plan to clean up all this dead code in the next weeks and @thofma wanted to remove the "kernel, but over another ring" functions today anyway.

@lgoettgens
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ah okay. I stumbled over this as ?kernel in Oscar shows it, and it still has the right default side.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (1fd3fe3) 86.98% compared to head (73049f6) 86.63%.

Files Patch % Lines
src/Matrix.jl 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1616      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.98%   86.63%   -0.36%     
==========================================
  Files         114      114              
  Lines       29686    29660      -26     
==========================================
- Hits        25823    25696     -127     
- Misses       3863     3964     +101     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lgoettgens
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Obsolete due to #1617

@lgoettgens lgoettgens closed this Feb 19, 2024
@lgoettgens lgoettgens deleted the lg/kernel branch February 19, 2024 21:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants