Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cherry-pick: Gas changes for low Max base fee and Priority fee (#28037) #28073

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Commits on Oct 24, 2024

  1. fix: Gas changes for low Max base fee and Priority fee (#28037)

    <!--
    Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
    Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
    completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
    -->
    
    ## **Description**
    
    Previously, if the Max base fee and Priority fee were reduced to very
    low values, the Network fee wouldn't update accordingly. This is a
    discrepancy with the gas calculations in the old flows.
    
    What fixes it is, for low enough values of `maxFeePerGas` (low enough to
    be lower than `minimumFeePerGas`), the Network fee becomes the Max fee
    -- `maxFeePerGas` times `gasLimit` directly. Apart from fixing the
    symptom explained above, this ensures that the Network fee is never
    higher than the Max fee.
    
    The PR also fixes this calculation when it comes to the L2 fees (inside
    `useTransactionGasFeeEstimate`).
    
    It also adds a missing override of `dappSuggestedFees` for both
    `maxFeePerGas` and `maxPriorityFeePerGas` (inside `useEIP1559TxFees`).
    
    [![Open in GitHub
    Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28037?quickstart=1)
    
    ## **Related issues**
    
    Fixes: #27802
    
    ## **Manual testing steps**
    
    See original report above.
    
    ## **Screenshots/Recordings**
    
    <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
    before and after of your change. -->
    
    ### **Before**
    
    <!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
    
    ### **After**
    
    <!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
    
    ## **Pre-merge author checklist**
    
    - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
    Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask
    Extension Coding
    Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
    - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
    - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
    - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
    if applicable
    - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
    guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
    Not required for external contributors.
    
    ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**
    
    - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
    app, test code being changed).
    - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
    in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
    as recordings and or screenshots.
    pedronfigueiredo committed Oct 24, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    365683d View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history