-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: cherry-pick: Gas changes for low Max base fee and Priority fee (#28037) #28073
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
<!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** Previously, if the Max base fee and Priority fee were reduced to very low values, the Network fee wouldn't update accordingly. This is a discrepancy with the gas calculations in the old flows. What fixes it is, for low enough values of `maxFeePerGas` (low enough to be lower than `minimumFeePerGas`), the Network fee becomes the Max fee -- `maxFeePerGas` times `gasLimit` directly. Apart from fixing the symptom explained above, this ensures that the Network fee is never higher than the Max fee. The PR also fixes this calculation when it comes to the L2 fees (inside `useTransactionGasFeeEstimate`). It also adds a missing override of `dappSuggestedFees` for both `maxFeePerGas` and `maxPriorityFeePerGas` (inside `useEIP1559TxFees`). [![Open in GitHub Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28037?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Fixes: #27802 ## **Manual testing steps** See original report above. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes. |
Builds ready [365683d]
Page Load Metrics (1764 ± 46 ms)
Bundle size diffs
|
hjetpoluru
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2024
metamaskbot
added
the
release-12.6.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.6.0
label
Oct 24, 2024
No release label on PR. Adding release label release-12.6.0 on PR, as PR was cherry-picked in branch 12.6.0. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
release-12.6.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.6.0
team-confirmations
Push issues to confirmations team
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick: #28037
Description
Previously, if the Max base fee and Priority fee were reduced to very low values, the Network fee wouldn't update accordingly. This is a discrepancy with the gas calculations in the old flows.
What fixes it is, for low enough values of
maxFeePerGas
(low enough to be lower thanminimumFeePerGas
), the Network fee becomes the Max fee --maxFeePerGas
timesgasLimit
directly. Apart from fixing the symptom explained above, this ensures that the Network fee is never higher than the Max fee.The PR also fixes this calculation when it comes to the L2 fees (inside
useTransactionGasFeeEstimate
).It also adds a missing override of
dappSuggestedFees
for bothmaxFeePerGas
andmaxPriorityFeePerGas
(insideuseEIP1559TxFees
).Related issues
Fixes: #27802
Manual testing steps
See original report above.
Screenshots/Recordings
Before
After
Pre-merge author checklist
Standards.
Pre-merge reviewer checklist
Description
Related issues
Fixes:
Manual testing steps
Screenshots/Recordings
Before
After
Pre-merge author checklist
Pre-merge reviewer checklist