-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix naming inconsistency khr #244
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix naming inconsistency khr #244
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this looks like the right direction, but the inconsistency still exists because now the CommandBuffer
and MutableCommandBuffer
classes are in the khr
namespace, but the Semaphore
class is not. Are you planning to move the Semaphore
class into the khr
namespace also?
As an aside, it looks like parts of this file were reformatted but had no other changes. I would generally advise against this, but if would like to reformat parts of the file could you please do it as the first or last commit? This will make it easier to see and review the non-formatting changes - thanks!
Hi @bashbaug |
Related to #233 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this mostly looks good to me, thanks for making these changes.
I have one specific comment for the test changes, see below.
Additionally, I'd like to reiterate that formatting related changes make it much harder to review this PR than it should be. I'd strongly recommend reverting the formatting changes to minimize diffs.
Finally it appears that this PR needs a rebase since there are merge conflicts.
tests/test_openclhpp.cpp
Outdated
namespace cl{ | ||
MAKE_MOVE_TESTS(Context, make_context, clReleaseContext, contextPool) | ||
|
||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a little ugly. How about this as an alternative:
- Separate out the "type" and the "typestr", whereas we just have a single "type" currently.
- Use
Context
as the "typestr" in this case, and e.g.CommandBuffer
as the "typestr" in the command buffer cases. - Use
cl::Context
as the "type" in this case, and e.g.cl::khr::CommandBuffer
as the "type" in the command buffer cases.
I think this will require fewer diffs, and it won't require putting the tests themselves inside of the cl
or cl::khr
namespaces, which they really shouldn't be doing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
139167b
to
f98dfed
Compare
f98dfed
to
73c5491
Compare
No description provided.