Skip to content

Conversation

@Tom-Willemsen
Copy link
Member

@Tom-Willemsen Tom-Willemsen commented Sep 18, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@iangillingham-stfc iangillingham-stfc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a handful of pedantic type incompatibilities and a function which 'could' be static.
Integration testing on a dev system worked well.

Copy link
Contributor

@iangillingham-stfc iangillingham-stfc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My previous questions re base class / derived class function return types has been answered and mitigated my the function decorators, which change the return types accordingly.
The function identified as could be static should remain as instance function as it uses self in derived classes.

@iangillingham-stfc iangillingham-stfc merged commit 4ef94ed into main Oct 1, 2024
11 checks passed
@iangillingham-stfc iangillingham-stfc deleted the 20_user_facing_dae branch October 1, 2024 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DAE: user-facing classes

5 participants