Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal to fix issue with annotations by adding a test in substituteAnnotation #1032

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Dec 8, 2016
Merged

Conversation

surli
Copy link
Collaborator

@surli surli commented Dec 8, 2016

Fix the issue #970 by adding a test in substituteAnnotation in ParentExiter: instead of just adding the annotation to the returnType of the method, it test before is the annotation is already there or not.

monperrus and others added 30 commits November 16, 2016 22:28
…ith an or instead of an and. Now the test is failing, proof that the assertion is checked :)
… a local variable in the same block or by a field (or a variable in another block). First detection implemented but patch not satisfying.
…rus/spoon into martin"

This reverts commit 2609284, reversing
changes made to 49d6e68.
…operties. Some choices have been done concerning some set methods in order to pass the test we should discuss.
… set to true or when it is set to false. When set to false, the scanner will detect name conflict and automatically import necessary types.
…g on CtElement (default behaviour until now).
Solve in using version of inria/master
@surli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

surli commented Dec 8, 2016

And dropwizard is well building with this fix.

@monperrus monperrus merged commit f8d129d into INRIA:master Dec 8, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants