Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Reduction: SAT to Circuit SAT #89

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions src/ProblemReductions.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ export findbest, BruteForce
export CNF
export ReductionSATToIndependentSet, ReductionSATToDominatingSet
export ReductionIndependentSetToSetPacking
export ReductionSATToCircuit

# reduction path
export ReductionGraph, reduction_graph, reduction_paths, implement_reduction_path
Expand Down
71 changes: 71 additions & 0 deletions src/rules/circuit_sat.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
"""
$TYPEDEF

The reduction result of an SAT problem o a Circuit SAT problem.

### Fields
- `target::CircuitSAT`: the target problem.
$TYPEDFIELDS
"""
struct ReductionSATToCircuit{} <: AbstractReductionResult
target::CircuitSAT
sat_symbols::Vector{Symbol}
end
target_problem(res::ReductionSATToCircuit) = res.target

Check warning on line 14 in src/rules/circuit_sat.jl

View check run for this annotation

Codecov / codecov/patch

src/rules/circuit_sat.jl#L14

Added line #L14 was not covered by tests

function reduceto(::Type{<:CircuitSAT}, s::Satisfiability)
return ReductionSATToCircuit( cnf_to_circuit_sat(s.cnf), s.variables)
end

function clause_to_boolean_expr(clause::CNFClause{T}) where T
literal_exprs = map(var ->
var.neg ? ¬( BooleanExpr(Symbol(var.name)) ) : BooleanExpr(Symbol(var.name)),
clause.vars
)
if length(literal_exprs) == 1
return literal_exprs[1]

Check warning on line 26 in src/rules/circuit_sat.jl

View check run for this annotation

Codecov / codecov/patch

src/rules/circuit_sat.jl#L26

Added line #L26 was not covered by tests
else
return BooleanExpr(:∨, literal_exprs)
end
end

function cnf_to_circuit_sat(cnf::CNF{T}) where T
exprs = Assignment[]
clause_outputs = Symbol[]
for clause in cnf.clauses
clause_output = gensym("clause")
clause_expr = clause_to_boolean_expr(clause)
push!(exprs, Assignment([clause_output], clause_expr))
push!(clause_outputs, clause_output)
end
final_output = gensym("out")
push!(exprs, Assignment([final_output], BooleanExpr(:∧, map(var -> BooleanExpr(var), clause_outputs))))
circuit = Circuit(exprs)
return CircuitSAT(circuit)
end

function extract_solution(res::ReductionSATToCircuit, sol)
if sol[length(sol)] == false
return nothing
end
extract_sol = falses(length(res.sat_symbols))
for (i, var) in enumerate(res.sat_symbols)
extract_sol[i] = sol[findfirst(==(var), res.target.symbols)]
end
return extract_sol
end

function extract_multiple_solutions(res::ReductionSATToCircuit, sol_set)
all_assignments = Vector{Vector{Bool}}()
for sol_tmp in sol_set
if sol_tmp[length(sol_tmp)] == false
continue
end
assignment = falses(length(res.sat_symbols))
for (i, var) in enumerate(res.sat_symbols)
assignment[i] = sol_tmp[findfirst(==(var), res.target.symbols)]
end
push!(all_assignments, assignment)
end
return unique(filter(sol -> sol !== nothing, all_assignments))
end
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions src/rules/rules.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -90,3 +90,4 @@ include("factoring_sat.jl")
include("sat_independentset.jl")
include("sat_dominatingset.jl")
include("independentset_setpacking.jl")
include("circuit_sat.jl")
45 changes: 45 additions & 0 deletions test/rules/circuit_sat.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
using Test, ProblemReductions

@testset "circuit_sat" begin
function verify(sat)
reduction_results = reduceto(CircuitSAT, sat)
circuit_tmp = reduction_results.target
sol_circuit = findbest(circuit_tmp, BruteForce())
s1 = Set(findbest(sat, BruteForce()))
s2 = Set(unique(filter(sol -> sol !== nothing, extract_solution.(Ref(reduction_results), sol_circuit))))
s3 = Set(extract_multiple_solutions(reduction_results, sol_circuit))
return (s2 ⊆ s1) && (s3 == s1)
end

# Example 001: satisfiable 3-SAT
x1 = BoolVar(:x1, false)
nx1 = BoolVar(:x1, true)
x2 = BoolVar(:x2, false)
nx2 = BoolVar(:x2, true)
x3 = BoolVar(:x3, false)
nx3 = BoolVar(:x3, true)

clause1 = CNFClause([x1, nx2, x3])
clause2 = CNFClause([nx1, x2, nx3])
clause3 = CNFClause([x1, nx2, nx3])
clause4 = CNFClause([nx1, x2, x3])

clause_lst = [clause1, clause2, clause3, clause4]
sat01 = Satisfiability(CNF(clause_lst))

@test verify(sat01)

# Example 002: satisfiable 3-SAT
clause5 = CNFClause([nx1, x2, x3])
clause6 = CNFClause([x1, nx2, x3])
clause7 = CNFClause([x1, x2, nx3])
sat02 = Satisfiability(CNF([clause5, clause6, clause7]))
@test verify(sat02)

# Example 003: satisfiable 3-SAT
clause8 = CNFClause([x1, x2, x3])
clause9 = CNFClause([nx1, nx2, nx3])
sat03 = Satisfiability(CNF([clause8, clause9]))
@test verify(sat03)

end
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions test/rules/rules.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ end
include("independentset_setpacking.jl")
end

@testset "circuit_sat" begin
include("circuit_sat.jl")
end

@testset "rules" begin
circuit = CircuitSAT(@circuit begin
x = a ∨ ¬b
Expand Down
Loading