Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix the incorrect tpcc resul and v5 parameters (pingcap#5473)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
dbsid authored Apr 25, 2021
1 parent 34bd8a5 commit 0ce9c82
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions benchmark/benchmark-sysbench-v5-vs-v4.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ readpool.unified.min-thread-count: 5
readpool.unified.max-thread-count: 20
readpool.storage.normal-concurrency: 10
pessimistic-txn.pipelined: true
enable-request-batch: false
```
#### TiDB v4.0 global variable configuration
Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions benchmark/v5.0-performance-benchmarking-with-tpcc.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ readpool.unified.min-thread-count: 5
rocksdb.max-background-jobs: 8
server.grpc-concurrency: 6
storage.scheduler-worker-pool-size: 20
enable-request-batch: false
```
#### TiDB v4.0 global variable configuration
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -143,6 +144,6 @@ set global tidb_enable_clustered_index = 1;

## Test result

According to the test statistics, the TPC-C performance of TiDB v5.0 has **increased by 25%** compared with that of TiDB v4.0.
According to the test statistics, the TPC-C performance of TiDB v5.0 has **increased by 36%** compared with that of TiDB v4.0.

![TPC-C](/media/tpcc_v5vsv4.png)
![TPC-C](/media/tpcc_v5vsv4_corrected.png)
Binary file added media/tpcc_v5vsv4_corrected.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.

0 comments on commit 0ce9c82

Please sign in to comment.