Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Page do scroll to bottom when send message in public room #52955

Conversation

Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor

@Anaslancer Anaslancer commented Nov 22, 2024

@akinwale

Explanation of Change

I've wrapped the scrollToBottomForCurrentUserAction function with InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions.

Fixed Issues

$ #52208.
PROPOSAL: #52208 (comment)

Tests

  1. Log in with gmail.
  2. Open #expensify-roadmap public room (https://staging.new.expensify.com/r/2091104345528462)
  3. Scroll to the top of the page
  4. Send a message
  5. Verify that: Page will scroll to bottom
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Log in with gmail.
  2. Open #expensify-roadmap public room (https://staging.new.expensify.com/r/2091104345528462)
  3. Scroll to the top of the page
  4. Send a message
  5. Verify that: Page will scroll to bottom
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
test.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
video1.mp4
iOS: Native
Recording.2024-12-08.183806.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Recording.2024-12-08.190941.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
386153028-162ba043-9a48-42a8-bb62-41d66ed71dc7.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Recording.2024-12-06.151751.mp4

@Anaslancer Anaslancer requested a review from a team as a code owner November 22, 2024 11:52
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from akinwale and removed request for a team November 22, 2024 11:53
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2024

@akinwale Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

@Anaslancer Please check all the boxes in the checklist.

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

akinwale commented Nov 27, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
52955-android-native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
52955-android-chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
52955-ios-native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
52955-ios-safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
52208-web.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
52208-desktop.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@akinwale akinwale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from aldo-expensify November 27, 2024 06:12
Copy link
Contributor

@akinwale akinwale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Anaslancer

You need to complete the following in the initial post.

  • Complete the checklist, meaning check all the boxes
  • Include your testing videos / screenshots for each platform

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

@Anaslancer bump on #52955 (review)

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @Anaslancer 👋 , are planning to finish the PR here?, it was pretty closed to be ready for merging, we just need you to follow the process of including the testing videos/screenshots.

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aldo-expensify I will add the videos in a few days. Thanks

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

@aldo-expensify I will add the videos in a few days. Thanks

Does a "few days" mean this week? or can it be longer

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

It will be this week, I am waiting my new mac.

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

It will be this week, I am waiting my new mac.

Ah, that is great, thanks for the information!

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

@Anaslancer Any updates here?

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am getting this error when npm run android;

Could not determine the dependencies of task ':react-native:packages:react-native:ReactAndroid:hermes-engine:configureBuildForHermes'.
> Could not create task ':react-native:packages:react-native:ReactAndroid:hermes-engine:installCMake'.
   > Could not find sdkmanager executable.

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

I am getting this error when npm run android;

Could not determine the dependencies of task ':react-native:packages:react-native:ReactAndroid:hermes-engine:configureBuildForHermes'.
> Could not create task ':react-native:packages:react-native:ReactAndroid:hermes-engine:installCMake'.
   > Could not find sdkmanager executable.

@Anaslancer Make sure you have your ANDROID_HOME environment variable set. You would also need to install the Android SDK build tools and platform tools (if not yet installed) on Android Studio. Launch Android Studio > Settings > Languages & Framework > Android SDK, select the SDK tools tab and then choose the missing dependencies to install.

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

akinwale commented Dec 13, 2024

image

Check in the SDK Tools tab.

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

@Anaslancer You can ask for guidance on this in the #expensify-open-source Slack channel if you are unable to resolve the problem.

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

But I don't have slack account for Expensify

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I requested before but they said they can't accept. Let me request again?

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Finally, I figured out we can't use Windows for android. I built it on MacOS

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@akinwale I've uploaded all videos.

@Anaslancer Anaslancer requested a review from akinwale December 16, 2024 11:21
Copy link
Contributor

@akinwale akinwale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@akinwale
Copy link
Contributor

@aldo-expensify All test videos have been uploaded. This is ready for your review.

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, thank you!

@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify merged commit 7d5bf75 into Expensify:main Dec 16, 2024
28 of 79 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/aldo-expensify in version: 9.0.77-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 failure ❌

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Anaslancer commented Dec 19, 2024

@akinwale , after pulling the code from staging, I can't run on web. Do you know why? Seems like web socket error
cc @aldo-expensify

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure what it may be, can you post a screenshot?

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screenshot_1

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Could you be missing a dependency? did you try running npm install?

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nope, I will try now

@Anaslancer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am going to have a travel, and will fix once back.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.0.77-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants