Skip to content

FAIL LII2* COMPARE_base_no_interp due to fields VEGWP[LN,PD] starting some time after ctsm5.3.059 #3617

@slevis-lmwg

Description

@slevis-lmwg

ncview helps show the diffs in VEGWPLN (diffs in VEGWPPD are more subtle) with file1 (use_init_interp = .true.) on the left and file 2 on the right (no_interp):

file 1=
 /glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/LII2FINIDATAREAS_D_P256x2_Ld1.f09_t232.I1850Clm60 BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-default.C.20251118_162221_1yxdza/run/LII2FINIDATAREAS
 _D_P256x2_Ld1.f09_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-default.C.20251118_1
 62221_1yxdza.clm2.h0a.0001-01-02-00000.nc.base
 file 2= 
 /glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/LII2FINIDATAREAS_D_P256x2_Ld1.f09_t232.I1850Clm60 BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-default.C.20251118_162221_1yxdza/run/LII2FINIDATAREAS
 _D_P256x2_Ld1.f09_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-default.C.20251118_1
 62221_1yxdza.clm2.h0a.0001-01-02-00000.nc.no_interp
Image

Originally posted by @slevis-lmwg in #3252

HISTORY

WHAT ELSE WE KNOW

  • In discussing this with @olyson and @wwieder, Keith and I decided I should remove the two fields from restart. This enabled the LII2 tests to pass as explained in FAIL LII2FINIDATAREAS_D_P256x2_Ld1.f09_g17.I1850Clm50BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-default COMPARE_base_no_interp #3252 (comment).
  • However, now restart tests fail (e.g. ERS) suggesting that the two fields do need to be in restart for some reason.
  • A lead (or a red herring?): Keith found that local-noon (LN) radiation fields do not go to restart, but they also get reset to spval differently than VEGWPLN.
  • In another conversation about this, @ekluzek wondered whether the VEGWP[LN,PD] and the local-noon radiation fields should both be in restart, so as to restart correctly in sub-daily restarts.
  • A detail that may implicate me in the source of the problem: I brought the h0a/h0i split to master in ctsm5.3.062, which may have broken these two fields while the LII2 tests were already labeled as expected failures.
  • Keith tells me that the VEGWP[LN,PD] code was introduced by @djk2120, so I'm pinging Daniel here to keep you in the loop.

CURRENT PATH FORWARD
I got consensus from @olyson @ekluzek @wwieder to proceed with

  • putting the VEGWP[LN,PD] fields back on restart
  • removing from history and
  • opening this issue

so as to proceed with ctsm5.4 work and resolve this at a later time.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

scienceEnhancement to or bug impacting science

Type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions