Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport #2327 #2332

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 26, 2022
Merged

Backport #2327 #2332

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 26, 2022

Conversation

lloeki
Copy link
Contributor

@lloeki lloeki commented Oct 26, 2022

What does this PR do?

Backport #2327

Motivation

Fixes CI

This version of rspec-mocks breaks CI for Ruby 2.7, 3.0 and 3.1 on
the following tests:

* ./spec/datadog/core/configuration_spec.rb:377 (Ruby 2.7)
* ./spec/datadog/core_spec.rb:35 (Ruby 2.7)
* ./spec/ddtrace/transport/http/builder_spec.rb:250 (Ruby 3.0, 3.1)

References:

* <https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/7560/workflows/24205733-d9fb-4781-962c-87499bad162d/jobs/280394>
* <https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/7560/workflows/24205733-d9fb-4781-962c-87499bad162d/jobs/280387>
* <https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/7560/workflows/24205733-d9fb-4781-962c-87499bad162d/jobs/280396>

I have not yet reported this upstream, but wanted to first unblock our
CI.
We already have something similar on the `Gemfile` for the gem but did not copy it
to the integration apps.

Bundler on Ruby 2.2 gets confused sometimes and tries to install a
more modern `byebug`/`pry-byebug` than it should:
<https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/7563/workflows/84415e5e-c561-4312-8e18-ff4d59394471/jobs/280478>
@lloeki lloeki requested a review from a team October 26, 2022 11:58
This was referenced Oct 26, 2022
@lloeki lloeki merged commit b11eb37 into 1.5-stable Oct 26, 2022
@lloeki lloeki deleted the backport/2327 branch October 26, 2022 13:13
@lloeki lloeki added this to the 1.5.2 milestone Oct 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants