Mark more shaders for building #1775
Open
+18
−13
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When the user registers a shader directly, assume it will be used for explicitly specified polygons (as opposed to a model) and mark the corresponding GLSL shaders for building. This gets creep and heat haze that we were missing before.
- Remove the hard-coded one for particles since the previous commit catches it. - Only build fog shaders if there is a fog.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This gets creep and heat haze that we were missing.
The one that's left that I know of is the human buildable construction shader. For that one we could do something in the cgame: either render it, or create a fake skin file that would trigger the shader to be built for models.
One more place we should probably look is in the alt shaders. Those correspond to
whenkeywords in the shader text. I haven't done those yet since we don't seem to have any that trigger new permutations.