Integrate `sphinxcadquery` to visualize 3D parts #111

Peque · 2019-02-26T01:10:41Z

Closes #105.

Seems to be working almost fine:

https://peertube.social/videos/watch/b922711c-b6d1-45d9-b44b-897b489e2781

Do not merge yet, just for discussion/impressions/feedback...

jmwright · 2019-02-26T01:17:51Z

@Peque Very cool. Great to see people using PeerTube as well.

adam-urbanczyk · 2019-02-26T08:21:08Z

@Peque thanks!

codecov · 2019-02-26T17:55:59Z

Codecov Report

Merging #111 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #111   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.58%   93.58%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        5316     5316           
  Branches      554      554           
=======================================
  Hits         4975     4975           
  Misses        215      215           
  Partials      126      126

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cadquery/occ_impl/exporters/__init__.py	`92.70% <100.00%> (ø)`

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5ad5fdf...7f02429. Read the comment docs.

Peque · 2019-02-26T22:47:22Z

Both issues are closed now, but read:

CadQuery/sphinxcadquery#8

Feel free to merge/close this. If any of you know (or want to learn) CSS and want to take on that issue, I would gladly accept a pull request! 😜

It is unlikely that I will work on that issue myself in the short (or maybe even long) term. 😇

jmwright · 2019-12-18T14:05:17Z

@Peque Sorry that this has been left sitting for so long. If I'm reading issue #8 from your fork correctly, this will break our ReadTheDocs theme (not badly, but still broken). There's also an issue of the patch breaking if the theme receives an update. Is that correct?

Themes could change and patches would break. Also, some themes can be affected by the patches.
The Read the Docs theme, for example, would lose its "gray" right column, which would become white instead, just like the text/content background.

Also, it sounds like the viewer is not working correctly at mobile device screen sizes.

You've been using this for your own project for awhile. What are your thoughts now on us using it for our Read The Docs implementation?

Peque · 2019-12-18T18:11:50Z

@jmwright Don't worry. This can stay idle until either:

You decide that having interactive 3D views in the examples is worth the downsides/risks (i.e.: slightly broken theme, broken display in mobile devices)
I, or someone else fixes sphinxcadquery's issues

So basically, you are correct. 😄

My thoughts are that 3D is cool enough, but that may be only because:

I would not really browse CadQuery's documentation on my phone
Maybe I am being selfish too, since having my project deployed in more places increases the chances of someone contributing a fix for those issues (they are at least fixable and there is documentation to do it).

If you do not want to integrate this (I would understand that), I think it would be good to leave the PR open anyways. This way, if someone wants to take on #105, they have a starting point.

rowanG077 · 2020-07-20T08:33:15Z

What's the status of this? I would like to use this for quite some time. What is blocking this?

Peque · 2020-07-20T12:28:52Z

I just rebased this MR and fixed CadQuery/sphinxcadquery#8 (in master, I did not make a new release, so if you want to try it out remember to use the latest development version of sphinxcadquery).

However, it seems 3D pieces are not showing up. There seems to be something broken when exporting to TJS from CadQuery or when loading these files from sphinxcadquery. If someone can have a look at it, that would be great. I do not think I will find time to fix that soon. 😇

I also quickly tried with AMF, but the result is the same: no 3D objects shown. If I replace the CadQuery exported AMFs with a rook, then the rook is displayed. So maybe something is broken with AMF exporting too or maybe I am just exporting it wrong... 😂

Peque · 2020-07-20T15:58:54Z

@adam-urbanczyk It seems the OCP support resulted in some changes in the exported files.

Doing a Git bisect:

Good:
- 1491e0c
- 30d6d0b
Possibly bad (skipped since I could not build docs):
- 98fa16a
- 4ce8fe0
Bad:
- 8d4ff71

The exported TJS of this part:

result = cadquery.Workplane("front").box(2.0, 2.0, 0.5)

Used to look like this:

{
    "metadata" :
    {
        "formatVersion" : 3,
        "generatedBy"   : "ParametricParts",
        "vertices"      : 24,
        "faces"         : 12,
        "normals"       : 0,
        "colors"        : 0,
        "uvs"           : 0,
        "materials"     : 1,
        "morphTargets"  : 0
    },

    "scale" : 1.0,

    "materials": [    {
    "DbgColor" : 15658734,
    "DbgIndex" : 0,
    "DbgName" : "Material",
    "colorAmbient" : [0.0, 0.0, 0.0],
    "colorDiffuse" : [0.6400000190734865, 0.10179081114814892, 0.126246120426746],
    "colorSpecular" : [0.5, 0.5, 0.5],
    "shading" : "Lambert",
    "specularCoef" : 50,
    "transparency" : 1.0,
    "vertexColors" : false
    }],

    "vertices": [-1.0, -1.0, -0.25, -1.0, -1.0, 0.25, -1.0, 1.0, 0.25, -1.0, 1.0, -0.25, 1.0, -1.0, -0.25, 1.0, -1.0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.0, -0.25, -1.0, -1.0, -0.25, 1.0, -1.0, -0.25, 1.0, -1.0, 0.25, -1.0, -1.0, 0.25, -1.0, 1.0, -0.25, 1.0, 1.0, -0.25, 1.0, 1.0, 0.25, -1.0, 1.0, 0.25, -1.0, -1.0, -0.25, -1.0, 1.0, -0.25, 1.0, 1.0, -0.25, 1.0, -1.0, -0.25, -1.0, -1.0, 0.25, -1.0, 1.0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.0, 0.25, 1.0, -1.0, 0.25],

    "morphTargets": [],

    "normals": [],

    "colors": [],

    "uvs": [[]],

    "faces": [0, 3, 1, 2, 0, 0, 1, 3, 0, 5, 7, 6, 0, 5, 4, 7, 0, 9, 10, 8, 0, 8, 10, 11, 0, 14, 13, 12, 0, 14, 12, 15, 0, 17, 18, 16, 0, 16, 18, 19, 0, 22, 21, 20, 0, 22, 20, 23]
}

And now it looks like this:

{
    "metadata" :
    {
        "formatVersion" : 3,
        "generatedBy"   : "ParametricParts",
        "vertices"      : 24,
        "faces"         : 12,
        "normals"       : 0,
        "colors"        : 0,
        "uvs"           : 0,
        "materials"     : 1,
        "morphTargets"  : 0
    },

    "scale" : 1.0,

    "materials": [    {
    "DbgColor" : 15658734,
    "DbgIndex" : 0,
    "DbgName" : "Material",
    "colorAmbient" : [0.0, 0.0, 0.0],
    "colorDiffuse" : [0.6400000190734865, 0.10179081114814892, 0.126246120426746],
    "colorSpecular" : [0.5, 0.5, 0.5],
    "shading" : "Lambert",
    "specularCoef" : 50,
    "transparency" : 1.0,
    "vertexColors" : false
    }],

    "vertices": [-1.0, -1.0, -0.25, -1.0, -1.0, 0.25, -1.0, 1.0, -0.25, -1.0, 1.0, 0.25, 1.0, -1.0, -0.25, 1.0, -1.0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.0, -0.25, 1.0, 1.0, 0.25, -1.0, -1.0, -0.25, 1.0, -1.0, -0.25, -1.0, -1.0, 0.25, 1.0, -1.0, 0.25, -1.0, 1.0, -0.25, 1.0, 1.0, -0.25, -1.0, 1.0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.0, 0.25, -1.0, -1.0, -0.25, -1.0, 1.0, -0.25, 1.0, -1.0, -0.25, 1.0, 1.0, -0.25, -1.0, -1.0, 0.25, -1.0, 1.0, 0.25, 1.0, -1.0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.0, 0.25],

    "morphTargets": [],

    "normals": [],

    "colors": [],

    "uvs": [[]],

    "faces": [0, 2, 1, 3, 0, 2, 3, 4, 0, 6, 5, 7, 0, 6, 7, 8, 0, 12, 10, 9, 0, 12, 9, 11, 0, 16, 14, 13, 0, 16, 13, 15, 0, 20, 18, 17, 0, 20, 17, 19, 0, 24, 22, 21, 0, 24, 21, 23]
}

If you replace the new file with the old one then the part is correctly visualized in the docs.

jmwright · 2020-08-04T20:20:56Z

@Peque You've been involved so I'm sure you're aware, but #420 should have fixed this issue.

Peque · 2020-08-04T23:29:18Z

@jmwright Thanks! I just rebased the PR. Have a look and tell me if it looks good to you (make sure to update to latest sphinxcadquery too). 😊

Some exported shapes look very rough by default (see the last one for example), but that seems to be because of the CadQuery's default tolerance. If the default tolerance is set to 0.001 instead of 0.1, it looks much nicer. Would it make sense to change that default?

jmwright · 2020-08-05T00:27:26Z

@Peque Sorry for my ignorance. Are you running this in a cadquery conda environment? Are you just running ./build-docs.sh? I keep getting the following error, so I'm not doing something right.

  File "/home/jwright/anaconda3/envs/cadquery/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq_directive.py", line 93, in setup
    app.add_directive("cq_plot", cq_directive, True, (0, 2, 0), **options)
TypeError: add_directive() got an unexpected keyword argument 'height'

marcus7070 · 2020-08-05T07:25:12Z

@jmwright, that's the same error as #398, are you using sphinx 2.4?

jmwright · 2020-08-05T12:30:12Z

I think I have a newer version. Isn't that what the following means? It's the same version number I get if I do sphinx-build --version.

$ pip install -U sphinx
Requirement already up-to-date: sphinx in /home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages (3.1.2)

Peque · 2020-08-05T12:34:11Z

@jmwright ~~I think Sphinx 3 should be fine.~~

It seems not, just try with:

pip install sphinx==2.4

Apparently cadquery.cq_directive is not compatible with Sphinx 3. If you remove cadquery.cq_directive from doc/conf.py you should be fine as well, since the directive is no longer used.

jmwright · 2020-08-05T12:42:17Z

I got a little further after forcing version 2.4.

$ ./build-docs.sh 
Running Sphinx v2.4.0
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/util/docutils.py:287: RemovedInSphinx30Warning: function based directive support is now deprecated. Use class based directive instead.
  RemovedInSphinx30Warning)
making output directory... done

Theme error:
sphinx_rtd_theme is no longer a hard dependency since version 1.4.0. Please install it manually.(pip install sphinx_rtd_theme)

So I did the pip install that the error message suggested and the docs seem to build now. I get these warnings though, I'm not sure if any of them matter.

WARNING: failed to import Workplane.rotateAndCopy
WARNING: failed to import BoxSelector
WARNING: failed to import BaseDirSelector
WARNING: failed to import DirectionNthSelector
WARNING: failed to import BinarySelector
WARNING: failed to import AndSelector
WARNING: failed to import SumSelector
WARNING: failed to import SubtractSelector
WARNING: failed to import InverseSelector
WARNING: failed to import BoxSelector
WARNING: failed to import BaseDirSelector
WARNING: failed to import DirectionNthSelector
WARNING: failed to import BinarySelector
WARNING: failed to import AndSelector
WARNING: failed to import SumSelector
WARNING: failed to import SubtractSelector
WARNING: failed to import InverseSelector
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.ellipse:10: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.ellipse:11: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.ellipse:16: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.interpPlate:11: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.interpPlate:12: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.interpPlate:14: WARNING: Field list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.wedge:5: WARNING: Field list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.wedge:11: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/cq.py:docstring of cadquery.Workplane.wedge:12: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/occ_impl/shapes.py:docstring of cadquery.Wire.assembleEdges:6: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/selectors.py:docstring of cadquery.StringSyntaxSelector:36: WARNING: Inline substitution_reference start-string without end-string.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/selectors.py:docstring of cadquery.StringSyntaxSelector:36: WARNING: Inline substitution_reference start-string without end-string.
/home/jwright/anaconda3/lib/python3.7/site-packages/cadquery/selectors.py:docstring of cadquery.StringSyntaxSelector:40: WARNING: Inline substitution_reference start-string without end-string.
/home/jwright/Downloads/temp/cadquery/doc/installation.rst:11: WARNING: Title underline too short.

Anaconda or Miniconda (Python 3.x editions), Python 3.x
----------------------------------------------
/home/jwright/Downloads/temp/cadquery/doc/intro.rst:57: WARNING: Inline interpreted text or phrase reference start-string without end-string.
/home/jwright/Downloads/temp/cadquery/doc/intro.rst:58: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/jwright/Downloads/temp/cadquery/doc/quickstart.rst:7: WARNING: duplicate object description of cadquery, other instance in classreference, use :noindex: for one of them
/home/jwright/Downloads/temp/cadquery/doc/quickstart.rst:12: WARNING: Title underline too short.

Prerequisites: Anaconda/Miniconda + CQ-editor running from an environment
==============================================================

jmwright · 2020-08-05T15:54:21Z

@Peque Should you go ahead and remove cadquery.cq_directive so that this will work with Sphinx 3? Will that cause a conflict with master?

You rebased on cadquery master after the tessellation update, correct? I still don't see the model in the view in the generated docs.

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-05T15:58:14Z

@jmwright please don't remove the old SVG rendering. If someone can fix it for sphinx 3 then great, if not I'd propose to leave it and stick with 2.4 (RTD supports custom sphinx version - we are currently building with 2.4).

jmwright · 2020-08-05T16:03:33Z

@adam-urbanczyk Do you not want the old SVG rendering removed because of browser compatibility?

Peque · 2020-08-05T16:56:01Z

@adam-urbanczyk By removing it I just meant the line in the docs/config.py file. That is enough to fix Sphinx 3 compatibility when building the documentation with this PR. 😊

With this PR all cq_plot directives are replaced with the new 3D ones, so it would not be necessary. The code would still be there for future use and a possible fix/upgrade of the directive for Sphinx 3 compatibility.

@jmwright Yeah, you need to serve the local files. That means, you could call python3 -m http.server from the target/docs directory and see if it works that way. It may be possible to avoid this somehow, but did not have a look at it.

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-06T06:45:37Z

@jmwright I want the SVG rendering kept to be able to generate pdf docs.

@Peque could you explain why the python3 -m http.server call is need?

Peque · 2020-08-06T07:45:20Z

@adam-urbanczyk Not really 🤷 . If you open the docs file directly with your browser and open your browser's console you will see some CORS policy errors when trying to load the local files.

As I said, it is probably fixable, but I am not sure how to do it. If someone can help with that, it would be great! 😇

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-07T06:31:49Z

So is this PR going to work with readthedocs?

Peque · 2020-08-09T17:12:13Z

@adam-urbanczyk I think you should be able to try that by enabling autobuild documentation for PRs. 😊

Peque · 2020-08-09T17:42:15Z

@adam-urbanczyk I tried it and it seems to work just fine:

https://cadquerytest.readthedocs.io/en/sphinxcadquery-nocqdirective/examples.html

However, I needed to push this commit, not sure why readthedocs was not using Sphinx 2.4 as specified in the .readthedocs.yaml config file. 🤷 If you do not mind, and since the cq_plot directive is not currently being used, I could push that commit to this PR too.

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-17T14:00:37Z

Closed/reopened o trigger readthedocs build.

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-17T14:36:13Z

@Peque thanks. The issue you are referring to is with readthedocs conf - I remember I had to contact their staff to enable defining sphinx version form the conda env. I did enable the readthedocs builds as you can see above and it looks indeed very nice in most of the cases. For more complicated objects I see some distortions though (below). Do you know what could cause them?

Peque · 2020-08-17T23:39:40Z

@adam-urbanczyk Yeah, that is just the result of the tessellation.

As mentioned in #111 (comment):

Some exported shapes look very rough by default (see the last one for example), but that seems to be because of the CadQuery's default tolerance. If the default tolerance is set to 0.001 instead of 0.1, it looks much nicer. Would it make sense to change that default?

What do you think? Lower tolerance by default may be the expected behavior by the end-user (i.e.: prefer quality over file size by default). But maybe not? 🤷

rowanG077 · 2020-08-18T08:37:27Z

@Peque Is it not possible to make that configureable in the sphinx config? That way a user can specify the accuracy he/she wants.

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-18T10:52:02Z

@Peque with the new defaults it looks much better, but some artifacts remain. Would you know how to change the angular tolerance for edge detection in three.js ?

Peque · 2020-08-18T11:16:48Z

@adam-urbanczyk Here:

https://github.com/Peque/sphinxcadquery/blob/master/sphinxcadquery/sphinxcadquerystatic/main.js#L51

It is set to 15 degrees now. That could be increased by default or parameterized, but 15 sounded as lenient enough to me. 🤷

Peque · 2020-08-18T11:17:53Z

@Peque Is it not possible to make that configureable in the sphinx config? That way a user can specify the accuracy he/she wants.

@rowanG077 Sure! Pull requests are welcome. 😜

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-18T13:34:26Z

@Peque I changed the default angular tolerance of toString to 0.05 [rad] (~3 deg) and the artifacts are completely gone. As far as I'm concerned it is good enough. Shall I merge this PR @jmwright ?

jmwright · 2020-08-18T13:54:04Z

@adam-urbanczyk +1 on merge

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-18T15:27:40Z

Thanks for the contribution @Peque , the docs look way cooler now.

jmwright · 2020-08-18T15:36:58Z

Yes, thank you @Peque

jmwright · 2020-08-18T15:39:10Z

Is anyone else having a problem with this page bogging their browser down now?

https://cadquery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/examples.html

Peque · 2020-08-18T15:52:30Z

@jmwright In my case I can feel the browser struggling a couple of seconds on load. Then it all feels smooth. But that may depend on your device of course (mine is a good laptop from 8 years ago: i7-2670QM @ 2.2GHz and 8 GB DDR3 1333 RAM). Maybe performance is really hurt on mobile devices (?).

Your internet connection speed may impact performance too, since there are many examples and maybe now, with the higher tolerance, some of them weight significantly more.

Performance could maybe be improved on sphinxcadquery side: CadQuery/sphinxcadquery#18

Also, maybe the examples section could be divided to avoid some load.

adam-urbanczyk · 2020-08-18T18:31:30Z

@jmwright It takes a moment to load, but after that it works fine (on my desktop PC).

Peque · 2020-08-19T10:04:04Z

@jmwright Maybe open a separate issue to discuss it?

rowanG077 · 2020-08-19T10:19:52Z

Works perfectly fine. It does take a while to load. But once it does it's fine for me. I run on an laptop with an Intel-7660u CPU. It's a couple of years old now.

jmwright · 2020-08-19T10:35:25Z

The page eventually loads for me, but Firefox keeps telling me that a script is slowing things down and asking me if I want to kill it. Both laptops I've tested on are within 1-1/2 years old and have decent specs.

I've opened an issue to discuss: #441

Peque force-pushed the sphinxcadquery branch from 62b0319 to 76643a1 Compare February 26, 2019 22:40

shimwell mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2020

Loading in external step files or mesh files ansys/pymapdl#234

Closed

Peque force-pushed the sphinxcadquery branch from 76643a1 to eb9857e Compare July 20, 2020 12:58

Peque mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2020

Broken TJS and AMF exports #416

Closed

Integrate sphinxcadquery to visualize 3D parts

b39cece

Peque force-pushed the sphinxcadquery branch from eb9857e to b39cece Compare August 4, 2020 22:33

adam-urbanczyk closed this Aug 17, 2020

adam-urbanczyk reopened this Aug 17, 2020

adam-urbanczyk added 3 commits August 18, 2020 10:47

Try different default export tolerance

abd3462

Change the tolerance for toString too

a563e7a

Merge branch 'master' into sphinxcadquery

f700c82

Tighter angularTolerance for toString

7f02429

adam-urbanczyk merged commit c7b7e95 into CadQuery:master Aug 18, 2020

marcus7070 mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2020

Time For A New Release? #483

Closed

Integrate sphinxcadquery to visualize 3D parts #111

Integrate sphinxcadquery to visualize 3D parts #111

Conversation

Peque commented Feb 26, 2019 • edited Loading

jmwright commented Feb 26, 2019

adam-urbanczyk commented Feb 26, 2019

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2019 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

Peque commented Feb 26, 2019

jmwright commented Dec 18, 2019

Peque commented Dec 18, 2019 • edited Loading

rowanG077 commented Jul 20, 2020

Peque commented Jul 20, 2020 • edited Loading

Peque commented Jul 20, 2020 • edited Loading

jmwright commented Aug 4, 2020

Peque commented Aug 4, 2020

jmwright commented Aug 5, 2020

marcus7070 commented Aug 5, 2020

jmwright commented Aug 5, 2020

Peque commented Aug 5, 2020 • edited Loading

jmwright commented Aug 5, 2020

jmwright commented Aug 5, 2020

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 5, 2020

jmwright commented Aug 5, 2020

Peque commented Aug 5, 2020 • edited Loading

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 6, 2020

Peque commented Aug 6, 2020

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 7, 2020

Peque commented Aug 9, 2020

Peque commented Aug 9, 2020

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 17, 2020

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 17, 2020

Peque commented Aug 17, 2020

rowanG077 commented Aug 18, 2020

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 18, 2020

Peque commented Aug 18, 2020

Peque commented Aug 18, 2020

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 18, 2020

jmwright commented Aug 18, 2020

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 18, 2020

jmwright commented Aug 18, 2020

jmwright commented Aug 18, 2020

Peque commented Aug 18, 2020

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 18, 2020 • edited Loading

Peque commented Aug 19, 2020

rowanG077 commented Aug 19, 2020

jmwright commented Aug 19, 2020

Integrate `sphinxcadquery` to visualize 3D parts #111

Integrate `sphinxcadquery` to visualize 3D parts #111

Peque commented Feb 26, 2019 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2019 •

edited

Loading

Peque commented Dec 18, 2019 •

edited

Loading

Peque commented Jul 20, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Peque commented Jul 20, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Peque commented Aug 5, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Peque commented Aug 5, 2020 •

edited

Loading

adam-urbanczyk commented Aug 18, 2020 •

edited

Loading