Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(core-api): fix /api/lock/unlocked payload validation #4488

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 14, 2021

Conversation

rainydio
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Require /api/lock/unlocked payload to be object and that it has ids property. Fixes #4481.

Checklist

  • Tests
  • Ready to be merged

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 14, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #4488 (00f59d0) into develop (e51071a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #4488   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    95.82%   95.82%           
========================================
  Files          744      744           
  Lines        18498    18498           
  Branches      2252     2252           
========================================
  Hits         17726    17726           
  Misses         565      565           
  Partials       207      207           
Flag Coverage Δ
functional 5.69% <ø> (ø)
integration 9.46% <ø> (ø)
unit 94.43% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/core-api/src/routes/locks.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e51071a...00f59d0. Read the comment docs.

@sebastijankuzner sebastijankuzner merged commit 72562a6 into develop Sep 14, 2021
@sebastijankuzner sebastijankuzner deleted the fix/core-api/locks-unlocked-schema branch September 14, 2021 08:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants