Fix PostgreSQL DATETIME serialization to use ISO 8601 format

[robfrank]

• Use PostgreSQL-compatible datetime format (yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS) instead of java.util.Date.toString() format
• Make SET command parsing case-insensitive for better compatibility
• Add tests to verify datetime serialization and case-insensitive SET commands

This fixes issue #1605 where datetime fields returned null in node-postgres library due to unparseable date format strings.

What does this PR do?

A brief description of the change being made with this pull request.

Motivation

What inspired you to submit this pull request?

Related issues

A list of issues either fixed, containing architectural discussions, otherwise relevant
for this Pull Request.

Additional Notes

Anything else we should know when reviewing?

Checklist

• I have run the build using mvn clean package command
• My unit tests cover both failure and success scenarios

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @robfrank, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the PostgreSQL compatibility layer by addressing critical issues related to datetime serialization and command parsing. It standardizes datetime output to a widely accepted ISO 8601 format, resolving client-side parsing failures, and makes the SET command more robust by allowing case-insensitive input. These changes collectively improve the reliability and usability of the PostgreSQL wire protocol implementation.

Highlights

• PostgreSQL DATETIME Serialization: Changed the serialization of Date and LocalDateTime objects to use the ISO 8601 format (yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS), ensuring compatibility with PostgreSQL clients like node-postgres.
• Case-Insensitive SET Command Parsing: The SET command and its parameters (e.g., datestyle) are now parsed case-insensitively, improving flexibility and user experience. This includes handling both = and TO as separators.
• New Test Coverage: Added new integration tests to verify the correct ISO 8601 datetime serialization and the case-insensitive parsing of SET datestyle commands.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[mergify]

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for ec83ddc.

🟢 All jobs passed!

But CI Insights is watching 👀

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request effectively addresses the issues related to PostgreSQL DATETIME serialization and introduces case-insensitive parsing for SET commands. The addition of dedicated tests for these fixes is highly commendable, ensuring the new functionality works as expected. However, there are a couple of areas that could be improved for robustness and consistency.

[claude]

Code Review: PostgreSQL DATETIME Serialization Fix

Thank you for addressing issue #1605! This PR makes important improvements to the PostgreSQL wire protocol compatibility. Here's my detailed review:

---

✅ Strengths

1. Solves the Core Problem

• The new datetime format yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS is PostgreSQL-compliant and will be properly parsed by node-postgres and other PostgreSQL clients
• Fixes both Date and LocalDateTime serialization in single values and arrays
• Addresses the case-sensitivity issues in SET command parsing

2. Good Test Coverage

• dateTimeSerializationFormat() test verifies the actual use case from issue PostgreSQL DATETIME serialization invalid #1605
• setDateStyleCaseInsensitive() test covers multiple case variations
• Tests are well-documented with references to the issue

3. Consistent Implementation

• Handles dates in both scalar values and array contexts
• Uses consistent formatting across all serialization paths

---

🔍 Issues & Recommendations

Critical: Timezone Handling

The current implementation always uses UTC (ZoneOffset.UTC):

LocalDateTime ldt = LocalDateTime.ofInstant(date.toInstant(), ZoneOffset.UTC);

Concerns:

1. Loss of timezone information: java.util.Date contains timezone-aware timestamps, but converting to LocalDateTime with UTC discards the original timezone
2. PostgreSQL timestamp types: PostgreSQL distinguishes between:
   • timestamp without time zone (what you're producing)
   • timestamp with time zone (what might be expected)
3. Database schema timezone: The codebase has database.getSchema().getTimeZone() (see DateUtils.java:63) - should this be used instead of hardcoding UTC?

Recommendation:

• Consider using ZonedDateTime or including timezone offset in the format
• Or document that all PostgreSQL timestamps are returned in UTC
• Verify this matches PostgreSQL's expectations for type 1082 (DATE) vs other timestamp types

Minor: Format Pattern

The format yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS uses 6 digits for fractional seconds, but:

• java.util.Date only has millisecond precision (3 digits)
• This will pad with zeros: 2024-05-19 17:05:11.123000 instead of .123

This is probably fine (PostgreSQL accepts it), but consider:

• Using SSS for millisecond-precision dates
• Or document that microsecond precision is zero-padded

Code Quality Issues

1. In PostgresNetworkExecutor.java:897-900

final String upperQuery = query.toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH);
final int setLength = "SET ".length();
final String q = query.substring(setLength);

Issue: upperQuery is created but only used on line 900, not for the actual parsing. The substring is taken from the original query, which is correct, but the variable name suggests it might have been intended differently.

Suggestion: Add a comment explaining why we need both the uppercase check and original case preservation for parsing.

2. In PostgresNetworkExecutor.java:902

parts = q.split("(?i)\\s+TO\\s+");

Issue: Uses regex with case-insensitive flag, which is good, but inconsistent with the = split on line 898.

Suggestion: For consistency and performance, consider using toUpperCase() on the string before splitting rather than regex flags.

3. Error Handling

The added validation (lines 904-907) is good:

if (parts.length < 2) {
  LogManager.instance().log(this, Level.WARNING, "Invalid SET command format: %s", query);
  return;
}

But it only logs - the client still receives "Setting ignored" response. Consider whether this should send an error response to the client instead.

Testing Gaps

1. Missing edge cases:

   • Date with microsecond precision (if supported)
   • Null datetime values
   • Array of dates (test only covers scalar values)
   • Time zones other than UTC

2. The real-world scenario:
   Issue PostgreSQL DATETIME serialization invalid #1605 specifically mentions the pg Node.js library. Consider adding a comment or documentation noting that while we can't easily test with actual Node.js in the Java test suite, the format has been verified to match PostgreSQL's expectations.

3. The existing isoDateFormat() test (line 372):

   • This test just verifies the SET command doesn't error
   • Consider enhancing it to actually verify the date format changes

---

🔒 Security Considerations

✅ No security concerns identified:

• No SQL injection risks (uses prepared statements)
• No sensitive data exposure
• Case-insensitive parsing doesn't introduce vulnerabilities
• Input validation is appropriate

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

Minor impact:

• DateTimeFormatter is immutable and thread-safe ✓
• Static final formatters avoid repeated parsing ✓
• .toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH) on every SET command is lightweight
• Overall performance impact: negligible

---

📝 Documentation & Style

Follows project standards:

• ✅ Code style matches existing patterns
• ✅ Comments are clear and reference the issue
• ✅ Test method names are descriptive

Missing:

• Checklist items in PR description not completed
• Consider updating PostgreSQL wire protocol documentation to mention datetime format

---

🎯 Recommendations Summary

Before merging:

1. Address timezone handling - clarify if UTC is intentional or if database timezone should be used
2. Add test for date arrays - verify array serialization works correctly
3. Complete PR checklist - run full build and confirm tests pass

Nice to have:
4. Document the datetime format in wire protocol documentation
5. Consider adding integration test comments about Node.js pg library compatibility
6. Enhance error handling for invalid SET commands

---

✅ Final Assessment

This is a solid fix that addresses a real compatibility issue. The core implementation is correct and will resolve the problem for Node.js users. With minor refinements around timezone handling and test coverage, this will be production-ready.

Recommended action: Address the timezone handling clarification, then merge.

---

Review conducted following CLAUDE.md guidelines

[claude]

Code Review for PR #3245

Thank you for addressing issue #1605! This PR makes important improvements to PostgreSQL protocol compatibility. Here's my detailed review:

✅ Strengths

1. Addresses the core issue: The PR correctly fixes the datetime serialization problem that was causing null values in node-postgres clients.

2. Good test coverage: The new tests verify both the datetime format issue and case-insensitive SET command parsing.

3. Case-insensitive parsing: Making the SET command case-insensitive improves PostgreSQL compatibility, which is important for different client libraries.

4. Proper error handling: Added warning log for invalid SET command format (line 903 in PostgresNetworkExecutor.java).

🔍 Issues & Concerns

1. CRITICAL: Incorrect DateTimeFormatter Pattern

Location: postgresw/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/postgres/PostgresType.java:73

private static final String POSTGRES_DATETIME_FORMAT = "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS";

Problem: The pattern uses SSSSSS (six S's) which represents milliseconds padded to 6 digits, NOT microseconds. In Java's DateTimeFormatter:

• SSS = milliseconds (0-999)
• SSSSSS = milliseconds with 6-digit padding (e.g., 123 becomes 123000)

This will produce incorrect values. For actual microsecond precision, you need:

private static final String POSTGRES_DATETIME_FORMAT = "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS";
// But use: LocalDateTime with nanosecond precision
// Or simply: "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS" for milliseconds

Note: LocalDateTime in Java has nanosecond precision, but PostgreSQL TIMESTAMP typically uses microsecond precision. The current format will zero-pad milliseconds to 6 digits, which may appear to work but doesn't preserve true microsecond precision.

Recommendation:

• If you only need millisecond precision: Use yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS
• If you need microsecond precision: Use Java 9+ with java.time.format.DateTimeFormatterBuilder and proper fraction-of-second handling

2. Timezone Handling Issue

Location: postgresw/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/postgres/PostgresType.java:233, 289

LocalDateTime ldt = LocalDateTime.ofInstant(date.toInstant(), ZoneOffset.UTC);

Problem: The code hardcodes ZoneOffset.UTC for all datetime conversions. This could be problematic if:

• The database schema has a different timezone setting
• Users expect datetime values to respect their configured timezone

Consideration: Check if this aligns with PostgreSQL's behavior. PostgreSQL TIMESTAMP (without time zone) stores values without timezone info, while TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE stores UTC and converts on output.

Recommendation: Verify that hardcoding UTC is the intended behavior. Consider checking database.getSchema().getTimeZone() (similar to how it's used in DateUtils.java:63).

3. Potential Bug in setConfiguration Method

Location: postgresw/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/postgres/PostgresNetworkExecutor.java:893

final String q = upperQuery.substring(setLength);

Problem: After converting the entire query to uppercase, you extract the parameter name and value from upperQuery. This means:

• If a user runs SET application_name = 'MyApp', it becomes SET APPLICATION_NAME = 'MYAPP'
• The value 'MyApp' is converted to 'MYAPP', which loses the original casing

Impact: This could break applications that rely on case-sensitive configuration values.

Fix: Extract parameter and value from the original query string, not upperQuery:

final String upperQuery = query.toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH);
final int setLength = "SET ".length();
final String q = query.substring(setLength);  // Use original query here!

String[] parts = q.split("=");
if (parts.length < 2) {
  parts = q.split("(?i)\\s+TO\\s+");  // Regex is already case-insensitive
}

4. Test Coverage Gaps

Missing test scenarios:

1. Microsecond precision test: Current test only checks the format, not actual precision:

   // Should test with microseconds
   st.execute("CREATE VERTEX TestDateTime SET created = '2024-05-19 17:05:11.123456'");

2. Array datetime test: The code handles datetime arrays (line 287-290), but there's no test for this.

3. Case preservation test: Should verify that SET command values preserve their original case:

   st.execute("SET application_name = 'MyApp'");
   // Verify value is 'MyApp', not 'MYAPP'

4. LocalDateTime vs Date test: Both types are handled differently; should test both code paths.

5. Code Style: Missing Locale in String Operations

Location: postgresw/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/postgres/PostgresNetworkExecutor.java:376

if (query.query.toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH).startsWith("SET ")) {

Good: You properly used Locale.ENGLISH here and in setConfiguration.

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority

1. Fix the DateTimeFormatter pattern - This is critical for data correctness
2. Fix case-preservation bug in setConfiguration - This could break applications
3. Add tests for microsecond precision - Verify the fix actually works correctly

Medium Priority

4. Review timezone handling - Ensure UTC hardcoding is intentional
5. Add array datetime tests - Verify array serialization works correctly
6. Document the datetime format choice - Add javadoc explaining why this format was chosen

Low Priority

7. Consider performance - DateTimeFormatter is thread-safe and efficient when used as a static final (✅ already done correctly)

📋 Checklist Review

From the PR description:

• ❌ "I have run the build using mvn clean package command" - Not checked
• ❌ "My unit tests cover both failure and success scenarios" - Missing some failure scenarios (invalid formats, edge cases)

🎓 Architectural Alignment

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines:

• ✅ Code follows existing patterns in the PostgreSQL wire protocol module
• ✅ Dependencies are properly scoped (provided scope for arcadedb-server)
• ⚠️ Tests should cover more edge cases per TDD approach
• ✅ Proper use of Locale.ENGLISH for string operations

Summary

This PR makes important progress on fixing the datetime serialization issue, but has a critical bug in the DateTimeFormatter pattern that needs immediate attention. The case-preservation bug in setConfiguration should also be fixed before merging.

Please address these issues and I'll be happy to review again! Great work on improving PostgreSQL compatibility. 🚀

[claude]

Code Review for PR #3245

Thank you for addressing issue #1605! This PR fixes a critical compatibility issue with the PostgreSQL wire protocol that was causing datetime fields to return null in node-postgres.

Strengths

1. Correct Root Cause Fix: datetime serialization now uses PostgreSQL-compatible ISO 8601 format
2. Comprehensive Coverage: Both Date and LocalDateTime handled in scalar and array contexts
3. Good Test Coverage: Added tests for datetime serialization and case-insensitive SET commands
4. UTC Timezone: Correctly uses ZoneOffset.UTC for consistent behavior

Critical Issue to Fix

Value Case Preservation Bug (PostgresNetworkExecutor.java:891-896):

The current implementation converts the entire query to uppercase, including values. This means SET application_name = 'MyApp' would store as 'MYAPP' (incorrectly uppercased).

Impact: Values that are case-sensitive will be corrupted.

Fix: Only uppercase for comparison, preserve original case for values by keeping query.substring(setLength) without toUpperCase(), then only lowercase the parameter name.

Suggestions

1. Test Enhancement: Add test for case-sensitive values
2. Format Verification: Verify actual format string in tests, not just parseability
3. Array Testing: Add test for datetime arrays

Summary

Excellent fix for a critical issue! After correcting the value uppercasing bug, this will be ready to merge. The datetime format fix is spot-on and will resolve the node-postgres compatibility problem.

Great work!

[robfrank]

@claude implement fixes suggested in #3245 (comment)

[claude]

Claude finished @robfrank's task in 2m 27s —— View job

---

Implementing fixes from code review ✓

Tasks

• Read the referenced review comment to understand all suggested fixes
• Read current state of modified files
• Fix case preservation bug in setConfiguration method
• Add test for case-sensitive values
• Add test for datetime arrays
• Commit and push changes

---

Changes Made

1. Fixed Case Preservation Bug

File: postgresw/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/postgres/PostgresNetworkExecutor.java:893

Changed from:

final String q = upperQuery.substring(setLength);

To:

// Use original query to preserve case of values
final String q = query.substring(setLength);

This ensures that values like 'MyApp' are not converted to 'MYAPP'. The upperQuery variable is still created for the initial case-insensitive check on line 891, but we now use the original query to extract the parameter/value portion, preserving the original case.

2. Added Test for Case-Sensitive Values

Test: setCommandPreservesCaseOfValues() in PostgresWJdbcIT.java

Verifies that the SET command preserves the original case of values (e.g., SET application_name = 'MyApp').

3. Added Test for Datetime Arrays

Test: dateTimeArraySerialization() in PostgresWJdbcIT.java

Verifies that datetime values in arrays are properly serialized and can be retrieved without errors.

---

Summary

Successfully implemented all fixes suggested in the code review:

1. ✅ Fixed the critical case preservation bug where SET command values were being uppercased
2. ✅ Added comprehensive test coverage for both the case preservation fix and datetime array serialization
3. ✅ Committed and pushed changes to the PR branch

The changes are minimal and focused, addressing exactly what was identified in the review. The fix preserves the original behavior for case-insensitive parameter name matching while correctly preserving the case of values.

Commit: 6793329

--- |

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.01%	✅ 69.57%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (bd2df88)	120533	65877	54.65%
Head commit (ec83ddc)	120547 (+14)	65892 (+15)	54.66% (+0.01%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#3245)	23	16	69.57%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[lvca]

Why is not using upper case anymore?

[robfrank]

all the if should use the uppercase to check the command and the pass the original query to executor.

Scenario:

• command: SeT ....
• check if SET is present on original query: false
• check if SET is present on uppercase query: true

[lvca]

Approved, please @robfrank check my comments if make any sense.

[claude]

Pull Request Review: Fix PostgreSQL DATETIME serialization to use ISO 8601 format

Thank you for addressing issue #1605! This PR makes important improvements to PostgreSQL protocol compatibility. Here's my detailed review:

---

✅ Positive Aspects

1. Excellent Problem Identification

• Correctly identifies the root cause: Date.toString() produces Java's default format instead of PostgreSQL-compatible format
• Addresses the critical compatibility issue with node-postgres library

2. Comprehensive Test Coverage

• Added 4 new test methods covering different scenarios:
  • dateTimeSerializationFormat(): Validates timestamp format compatibility
  • setDateStyleCaseInsensitive(): Tests case-insensitive SET command
  • setCommandPreservesCaseOfValues(): Ensures values aren't uppercased
  • dateTimeArraySerialization(): Tests datetime arrays
• Tests follow existing patterns in the codebase

3. Good Case-Insensitivity Handling

• Uses toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH) consistently (line 417 in PostgresNetworkExecutor.java)
• Regex (?i)\\s+TO\\s+ for case-insensitive "TO" matching (line 1081)
• Preserves original case of values while normalizing parameter names

---

🔍 Issues & Concerns

Critical: Date Format Inconsistency

Problem: The PR introduces a different datetime format than what exists in the codebase.

• PostgresType.java (line 73): Uses yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS (PostgreSQL format, no 'T', 6 decimal places)
• DateUtils.DATE_TIME_ISO_8601_FORMAT: Uses yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ssZ (ISO 8601 with 'T' separator and timezone)
• PostgresNetworkExecutor.java (line 1098): References DateUtils.DATE_TIME_ISO_8601_FORMAT

Issue: When a client sets datestyle = ISO, it will use the DateUtils format (with 'T'), but all datetime serialization uses the PostgresType format (without 'T'). This creates inconsistency.

Recommendation:

1. Add a new constant in DateUtils (e.g., POSTGRES_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT) for "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS"
2. Use this constant in both PostgresType.java and PostgresNetworkExecutor.java
3. This maintains consistency and makes the format centrally managed

Medium: Timezone Handling

Issue: The PR hardcodes ZoneOffset.UTC when converting dates:

LocalDateTime ldt = LocalDateTime.ofInstant(date.toInstant(), ZoneOffset.UTC);

Concerns:

• PostgreSQL clients may expect timezone-aware timestamps
• The database might have a configured timezone that should be respected
• PostgreSQL actually supports timestamp (no tz) vs timestamptz (with tz) types

Recommendation:

• Consider using the database's configured timezone instead of hardcoding UTC
• Add a comment explaining why UTC is used (if that's the intended behavior)
• Consider adding tests with non-UTC timezones to verify behavior

Medium: Unused DateUtils Import

Issue: PostgresType.java imports DateUtils (line 27) but doesn't use any of its constants. Instead, it defines its own format locally.

Recommendation: Either use DateUtils constants or remove the import.

Low: Magic String "opencypher"

Code (PostgresNetworkExecutor.java:482):

if (portal.language.equals("cypher") || portal.language.equals("opencypher")) {

Issue: This appears to be an unrelated change that adds support for "opencypher" language. While potentially useful, it's not mentioned in the PR description and seems out of scope.

Recommendation:

• If this is intentional, add a test case for "opencypher"
• If not, this should be in a separate PR
• Add a comment explaining what "opencypher" is and why it needs the same parameter handling as "cypher"

Low: Array Format Verification

Issue: The test dateTimeArraySerialization() (lines 445-476) verifies arrays are not null but doesn't verify the actual format of the serialized datetime strings.

Recommendation:

// Verify dates are formatted correctly
assertThat(dates[0].toString()).matches("\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2} \\d{2}:\\d{2}:\\d{2}\\.\\d{6}");

---

🔒 Security Considerations

✅ No security issues identified:

• Proper use of Locale.ENGLISH prevents locale-based attacks
• Regex for "TO" parsing is safe
• No SQL injection vectors introduced
• Input validation preserved

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

✅ Performance impact is minimal:

• DateTimeFormatter is thread-safe and can be reused (correctly done as static final)
• String operations in setConfiguration are reasonable
• No unnecessary allocations in hot paths

Minor suggestion: The regex split in setConfiguration (line 1081) is compiled each time. For a hot path, consider:

private static final Pattern TO_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("(?i)\\s+TO\\s+");
// Then use: parts = TO_PATTERN.split(q);

---

📋 Recommendations Summary

Must Fix:

1. Date format consistency: Centralize the PostgreSQL timestamp format in DateUtils and use it consistently

Should Fix:

2. Timezone handling: Document or reconsider hardcoded UTC usage
3. Clarify opencypher change: Document or split into separate PR
4. Test completeness: Verify actual datetime format strings in array test

Nice to Have:

5. Remove unused import: Clean up DateUtils import in PostgresType.java
6. Performance optimization: Pre-compile regex pattern
7. Add edge case tests: Test with various timezones, null values, malformed SET commands

---

✅ Checklist Review

Per CLAUDE.md requirements:

• ✅ Tests written first (TDD approach followed)
• ⚠️ PR checklist items not marked as complete in description
• ✅ Code adheres to existing style
• ⚠️ Need to verify: mvn clean package passes
• ⚠️ Need to verify: Related tests run successfully

---

🎯 Overall Assessment

This PR makes significant progress on fixing issue #1605. The core fix is sound, and the test coverage is good. However, the date format inconsistency between DateUtils and PostgresType needs to be resolved before merging to ensure predictable behavior across the PostgreSQL protocol implementation.

Recommendation: Request changes to address the date format consistency issue, then approve once resolved.