Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support adding general reactions to messages #559

Closed
kaustubh-nair opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

Support adding general reactions to messages #559

kaustubh-nair opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 7 comments
Labels
GSoC Possible GSoC project component high priority should be done as soon as possible missing feature: user A missing feature for all users, present in another Zulip client
Milestone

Comments

@kaustubh-nair
Copy link
Member

With #525 merged, we should be able to added all kinds of reactions to messages from ZT, we currently support only :+1:

For a v2 version, this can also extended to display the suggestions in the footer, once #540 is merged

@kaustubh-nair
Copy link
Member Author

@zulipbot add "enhancement"

@zulipbot zulipbot added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 25, 2020
@neiljp neiljp changed the title Support adding reactions to messages Support adding general reactions to messages (beyond 👍) Apr 1, 2020
@neiljp neiljp changed the title Support adding general reactions to messages (beyond 👍) Support adding general reactions to messages Apr 1, 2020
@neiljp neiljp added the high priority should be done as soon as possible label Apr 16, 2020
@neiljp
Copy link
Collaborator

neiljp commented Apr 16, 2020

Marked this as high priority, since this is something users likely switch to another front-end for (eg. webapp)

@neiljp neiljp added the GSoC Possible GSoC project component label Apr 23, 2020
@kaustubh-nair kaustubh-nair self-assigned this Jun 30, 2020
@zulipbot
Copy link
Member

zulipbot commented Jul 10, 2020

Hello @kaustubh-nair, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 14 days.

You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting @zulipbot claim on that issue.

Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon!

@zulipbot
Copy link
Member

zulipbot commented Sep 8, 2020

Hello @kaustubh-nair, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 14 days.

You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting @zulipbot claim on that issue.

Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon!

@zee-bit
Copy link
Member

zee-bit commented Feb 1, 2021

@neiljp This issue looks very interesting to me. Unless @kaustubh-nair wants to continue his work on this issue, I would love to tackle it, by potentially building/improving on top of his work.

@kaustubh-nair
Copy link
Member Author

@zee-bit go ahead 👍
#707 should be mostly useable but might require some improvements on PopUpBox.

@neiljp neiljp added missing feature: user A missing feature for all users, present in another Zulip client and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 5, 2021
@neiljp
Copy link
Collaborator

neiljp commented Aug 17, 2021

This is now resolved by #913 🎉

@neiljp neiljp closed this as completed Aug 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
GSoC Possible GSoC project component high priority should be done as soon as possible missing feature: user A missing feature for all users, present in another Zulip client
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants