Add Response.json binding

[DCKT]

Hi !

I found out Response.json method was missing and misleading (vs response.json()).
I made the choice to not restrict the type for a better usage as you can pass a JS object.
I also updated the example to reflect more the use case.

Cheers

[zth]

@DCKT awesome, thank you!

I wonder if we should have a dedicated version taking a JSON.t though, and then have this here too but prepend it with "unsafe" or similar. What do you think?

[DCKT]

Yes great idea, having both is nice 👌 Le dim. 18 févr. 2024 à 21:21, Gabriel Nordeborn ***@***.***> a écrit :

…

@DCKT <https://github.com/DCKT> awesome, thank you! I wonder if we should have a dedicated version taking a JSON.t though, and then have this here too but prepend it with "unsafe" or similar. What do you think? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAL2BBPMDKBHQAOCGGJAKBDYUJPFZAVCNFSM6AAAAABDNORFJGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJRGQZTKMJTGA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[zth]

@DCKT great stuff! Please add an entry to the changelog as well. Also, thanks for the PRs, keep them coming! 😄