Skip to content

Justify the backend choice NIZK-R1CS #14

@luisbran

Description

@luisbran

Proposed contribution: Provide more rationale for the choice on NIZK and R1CS. Section 3.2 could benefit from a comparative overview of the various low-level backend options for representing relations. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of interactive vs. non-interactive, and of several representations (e.g., including arithmetic circuits), may open more room for future document contributions on the cases that have not yet been explored in the existing documentation.

Related locations: Chapter 2 (implementation)

Proposed contributors: Needs contributors

Contribution context: Proposed in the "NIST comments on the initial ZKProof documentation" (April 06, 2019) --- item C17.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions