Add Tuya vibration sensor with accelerometer _TZE200_iba1ckek

[jezzaaa]

Proposed change

This change is to add a quirk for the Tuya TS0601 vibration sensor that provides sensors for accelerometer data.

Additional information

This quirk replaces a generic quirk that works only for vibration status, but presents no sensors for accelerometer data.

Checklist

• [✓] The changes are tested and work correctly
• [✓] pre-commit checks pass / the code has been formatted using Black
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works
  I don't know how to write a test for the code. It loads correctly, allows pairing, and correctly presents the data without errors in the log.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.13%. Comparing base (2e2bbd9) to head (3b4b478).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #4242   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.13%   92.13%           
=======================================
  Files         358      359    +1     
  Lines       11919    11931   +12     
=======================================
+ Hits        10981    10993   +12     
  Misses        938      938           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jezzaaa]

I don't know how to fix the Codecov errors. It doesn't seem to be exercising my converter function. Some of the other quirks in the codebase (that use the TuyaQuirkBuilder) have a similar structure to mine, with the converter function being referenced only in the .sensor/.enum/.whatever definition, and nowhere else, and with the converter function defined similarly to how I'm doing it. Some guidance on this issue would be grateful.

[weboide]

Works as intended. This adds the x, y and z acceleration values.

Tested in 2025.8.3

[jezzaaa]

@TheJulianJES I believe all of the Codecov issues have been resolved, with new test code incorporated into the PR. What's the next stage for having this PR accepted? Thankyou