-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
Option to update the PR comment – improvements #42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Option to update the PR comment – improvements #42
Conversation
ef498d7
to
26ab5bf
Compare
Hi @bartosz347! Curious why you didn't simply contribute to the original PR #28? |
Hey @zgosalvez, that's what I've wanted to do at first, but I think I can't contribute to the existing PR – I'd have to push to its author's repository (I don't have RW access). Only maintainers are allowed to add new commits. Or maybe I'm wrong – please tell me how can I do this :) |
Not exactly, #28 has a return statement which omits |
df3091c
to
767e21c
Compare
767e21c
to
4956737
Compare
4956737
to
84680f0
Compare
Hey @zgosalvez looks like something's wrong with Build & Test pipeline, it can't check out code from fork. Would you be able to fix this and merge my PR? |
84680f0
to
bc0168d
Compare
Would love to see this addition and fixes for v3! |
Addressed in #85 🚀 |
Bumps [@biomejs/biome](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/tree/HEAD/packages/@biomejs/biome) from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/commits/cli/v1.8.2/packages/@biomejs/biome) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@biomejs/biome" dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
I've rebased the PR #28 created by @oacik and applied some improvements to properly handle
minimum-coverage
check.I've tested the changes in a test repository – bartosz347/github-actions-flutter-workflows#1. The build is failing intentionally – to test minimum coverage requirement. I've tested the following scenarios:
update-comment: false
(regression)In both 3. and 4. the comment bartosz347/github-actions-flutter-workflows#1 (comment) has been updated. In 5. new comment has been created.
If there's any better way to contribute to the previous PR, please let me know. Thanks @oacik for your work!