Skip to content

Comment contract code #104

@0xernesto

Description

@0xernesto

It would be nice if the contract code was commented to make it easier to follow. Consider using NatSpec format. I understand most people will treat these contracts as a black box and trust the code because it's audited, but some of us want to understand the code before committing to using Kernel. Comments would save a lot of time when reviewing the code.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions