drivers: flash: spi_nor: select largest valid erase operation #60943
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @Crzyrndm, and thank you very much for your first pull request to the Zephyr project!
A project maintainer just triggered our CI pipeline to run it against your PR and ensure it's compliant and doesn't cause any issues. You might want to take this opportunity to review the project's Contributor Expectations and make any updates to your pull request if necessary. 😊
|
Test failure is unrelated? Seems like #60941 |
Was it the |
Crzyrndm
force-pushed
the
spi-nor-erase-selector
branch
from
eefd7ec
to
d400365
Compare
|
Test failure again unrelated? |
de-nordic
added
backport v2.7-branch
The spi_nor erase op selection was based on the alignment of the end of the region to be erased. This prevented larger erase operations being selected in many cases Closes zephyrproject-rtos#60904 Signed-off-by: Joshua Crawford <joshua.crawford@levno.com>
Crzyrndm
force-pushed
the
spi-nor-erase-selector
branch
from
d400365
to
c8b6210
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @Crzyrndm!
Congratulations on getting your very first Zephyr pull request merged 🎉🥳. This is a fantastic achievement, and we're thrilled to have you as part of our community!
To celebrate this milestone and showcase your contribution, we'd love to award you the Zephyr Technical Contributor badge. If you're interested, please claim your badge by filling out this form: Claim Your Zephyr Badge.
Thank you for your valuable input, and we look forward to seeing more of your contributions in the future! 🪁
The spi_nor erase op selection was based on the alignment of the end of the region to be erased. This prevented larger erase operations being selected in many cases
Closes #60904