-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multimanifest prep #266
Merged
carlescufi
merged 15 commits into
zephyrproject-rtos:master
from
mbolivar:multimanifest-prep
May 20, 2019
Merged
Multimanifest prep #266
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
41fbf25
tests: flatten the hierarchy
mbolivar-nordic 8d329be
tests: remove empty_config.py
mbolivar-nordic 884170e
tests: don't test pre-unification features
mbolivar-nordic 1cb9be1
tests: fixture setup optimizations
mbolivar-nordic 6dd7b53
main: fix CalledProcessError handling
mbolivar-nordic 18408dd
main.py: don't throw away tracebacks
mbolivar-nordic f98b719
manifest: demote Project remote to a kwarg
mbolivar-nordic f87254a
manifest: support explicit project URLs
mbolivar-nordic 58ee6de
manifest: demote defaults to a kwarg
mbolivar-nordic a774380
tests: add test cases for explicit project URLs
mbolivar-nordic 0d07974
manifest: project names must be unique
mbolivar-nordic ebae08f
util: add canon_path()
mbolivar-nordic 0fcdc25
tests: fix test_config.py on windows
mbolivar-nordic 781ac46
tests: conftest: use command strings exactly on Windows
mbolivar-nordic 2df535a
tests: fix test_project.py on Windows
mbolivar-nordic File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't this fix a GitHub issue? I seem to recall there was one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is essential to the design of the multimanifest feature. Projects are identified by their names in that work; it's how we decide what projects to apply overrides of attributes like
url
,name
, etc. to. This means it doesn't make sense to continue allowing two projects with the same "name" in a single manifest. Arguably it never did, but it was necessary before because some projects might have had the same final path component in a URL but different URL bases. That case can be handled now with an expliciturl:
for at least one of the two.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Understood, thanks for the explanation