Skip to content

Conversation

@ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Aug 27, 2024

Fixes #1645

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes include significant updates to the DelegateProxyHandler class in delegate.ts, enhancing field validation and handling of delegate models. Additionally, a new regression test file addresses issue #1645, focusing on the creation and updating of complex e-commerce order models, ensuring that relationships and constraints are properly validated.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/delegate.ts Modified DelegateProxyHandler to use requireField for field validation; changed const result type to any.
tests/regression/tests/issue-1645.test.ts Introduced a regression test for issue #1645, validating the handling of nested model relationships in e-commerce orders.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant System
    participant Database

    User->>System: Create Order
    System->>Database: Update Order with Billing and Shipping Address
    Database-->>System: Return updated Order with Addresses
    System-->>User: Display Order Details
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Delegate model should return extended model fields in nested include (1645)
Ensure that relationships and constraints in models function as intended (1645)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/delegate.ts (1)

Line range hint 1143-1147: Consider using a more specific type instead of any.

The assembleHierarchy method is correctly implemented, but the use of any should be reconsidered for better type safety.

Consider using a more specific type for the result variable to improve type safety.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 19a3b5d and 98aec93.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/delegate.ts (3 hunks)
  • tests/regression/tests/issue-1645.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (14)
tests/regression/tests/issue-1645.test.ts (10)

1-1: LGTM!

The import statement is correct and necessary for the test.

The code changes are approved.


2-2: LGTM!

The describe block is correctly used to group related tests.

The code changes are approved.


3-3: LGTM!

The it block is correctly used to define the test case.

The code changes are approved.


4-137: LGTM!

The schema definitions are comprehensive and cover the necessary models for the test.

The code changes are approved.


138-139: LGTM!

The enhance function is correctly used to enhance the database client.

The code changes are approved.


141-141: LGTM!

The user creation is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


143-157: LGTM!

The shipping address creation is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


159-173: LGTM!

The billing address creation is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


175-185: LGTM!

The order creation is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


187-202: LGTM!

The order update and assertions are correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.

packages/runtime/src/enhancements/delegate.ts (4)

Line range hint 1-15: LGTM!

The import statements are correct and necessary for the functionality.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 22-27: LGTM!

The constructor is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 54-92: LGTM!

The doFind method is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


155-167: LGTM!

The injectSelectIncludeHierarchy method is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98aec93 and 61a9141.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/delegate.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/runtime/src/enhancements/delegate.ts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants