Skip to content

Conversation

@ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Sep 1, 2025

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 1, 2025 11:22
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ymc9 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4821aec and 3564afd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/ide/vscode/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/language/langium-config.json (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/vscode

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the VS Code extension configuration to fix version inconsistencies and language identifier alignment.

  • Updates VS Code extension version from 3.0.2 to 3.0.5
  • Changes language ID from "zmodel" to "zmodel-v3" to align with the V3 branding

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
packages/language/langium-config.json Updates language ID to include v3 suffix for consistency
packages/ide/vscode/package.json Bumps extension version to 3.0.5

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job


Code Review Complete ✅

I've thoroughly reviewed this pull request. Here's my detailed analysis:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the changed files
  • Evaluate the version bump changes
  • Assess the language ID modification
  • Check for any potential issues or improvements
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Review Summary

This PR makes two focused changes to align VS Code extension configuration:

Code Quality & Best Practices

  • Clean, targeted changes: The modifications are minimal and focused on the specific issue
  • Consistent language ID: Both files now use zmodel-v3 consistently across the configuration
  • Proper JSON formatting: All changes maintain correct JSON structure

Changes Analysis

1. Version Bump (packages/ide/vscode/package.json:4)

  • Version updated from 3.0.23.0.5
  • This appears to be a patch-level increment, appropriate for bug fixes
  • Note: The main project version is 3.0.0-beta.1, so the extension version being 3.0.5 suggests independent versioning

2. Language ID Standardization (packages/language/langium-config.json:5)

  • Language ID changed from zmodelzmodel-v3
  • This change is consistently applied across all VS Code extension references:
    • package.json:60 - Language contribution ID
    • package.json:77 - Grammar language reference
    • package.json:84 - Activation event
    • src/extension/main.ts:46,50 - Language client configuration
    • README.md:25 - Documentation examples

🔍 Potential Issues & Considerations

  • Breaking change impact: Users with existing VS Code settings referencing zmodel will need to update to zmodel-v3
  • Migration path: The README.md already documents this transition well
  • Backward compatibility: This intentionally breaks compatibility with v2, which is appropriate for a major version change

Performance Considerations

  • No performance impact - these are static configuration changes
  • Language server initialization remains unchanged

🔒 Security Concerns

  • No security implications in these configuration changes
  • All changes are to metadata/configuration files

🧪 Test Coverage

  • No test files were modified, but these are configuration changes that don't require unit tests
  • Recommendation: Manual testing should verify:
    • VS Code extension loads correctly with new language ID
    • Syntax highlighting works for .zmodel files
    • Language server activates properly

Recommendations

  1. Changes look good - well-aligned and consistent
  2. 📝 Consider adding to changelog if one exists for the VS Code extension
  3. 🔄 Verify manual testing of VS Code extension functionality before release
  4. 📚 Documentation is already up-to-date - great job on the README

Verdict: APPROVED

This is a clean, well-executed fix that properly aligns the VS Code extension configuration with the v3 branding strategy.


@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 7d10be5 into dev Sep 1, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants