-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
Fix for timeout config parameter validation #168
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@klimser We need add unit tests to cover these changes.
@webimpress There are already existed tests that were failed and now passed:
|
3 days ago builds on |
I've updated my project to current release -> project was destroyed -> I found the reason, place in code ->I found that changes were made with tests -> I ran tests -> I got exception -> I fixed a bug -> Tests passed -> I created a pull request. |
These tests are run only when |
actually, the |
Agree. Fixed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@klimser I had another look on it and I can confirm it was a bug, and your fix is correct. We haven't seen it in tests, because as you noticed these test were skipped. It would be nice to enable them on Travis.
Anyway - LGTM 👍 Thanks!
Forward port #168 Conflicts: CHANGELOG.md
Thanks, @klimser. |
Validation conditions for integer or numeric timeout was mutually exclusive, fixed.