This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 30, 2020. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 30, 2020. It is now read-only.
DateTimeFormatter #58
Open
Description
Is there any reason why DateTime::ISO8601 is still used in DateTimeFormatter?
Taken from the docs:
DateTime::ISO8601
DATE_ISO8601
ISO-8601 (example: 2005-08-15T15:52:01+0000)
Note: This format is not compatible with ISO-8601, but is left this way for backward compatibility reasons. Use DateTime::ATOM or DATE_ATOM for compatibility with ISO-8601 instead.
DateTime::ATOM
DATE_ATOM
Atom (example: 2005-08-15T15:52:01+00:00)