Should dcterms:creator be mandatory?

[tpluscode]

For visualize, the cube requires the presence of dcterms:creator in addition to schema:creator

Is that property only required in that context? @l00mi
Maybe we need a profile for visualize with this and other extensions? @Rdataflow

[tpluscode]

Cube Creator added that validation to its shape by requiring that schema:creator equals dctems:creator

[Rdataflow]

Maybe we need a profile for visualize with this and other extensions? @Rdataflow
💯 we need such kind of checks automated.
adrian mentioned 3 validation profiles and I agree on this.

• cube.link spec conformity
• opendata.swiss conformity (incl. cube.link)
• visualize conformity (incl. opendata.swiss)
  @tpluscode would you take this?

cc @MartinaElsawy @ClaudioDiGallo you may follow this here https://gitlab.ldbar.ch/bafu/visualize/-/issues/564

[Rdataflow]

Cube Creator added that validation to its shape by requiring that schema:creator equals dctems:creator

• 💯 would be good to have this check in validation
• can we keep all the relevant validation in 1 place (once only) and reuse it from there i.e. in cube-creator? - else we will suffer diversity in validation 🙃