Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore docs changes for yb-ctl GH action #7388

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2021

Conversation

iSignal
Copy link
Contributor

@iSignal iSignal commented Feb 26, 2021

yb-ctl workflow was being run for updates to the docs pages for it.

@iSignal iSignal requested a review from polarweasel February 26, 2021 00:55
@iSignal iSignal changed the title Ignore docs changes for yb-ctl workflow Ignore docs changes for yb-ctl GH action Feb 26, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@polarweasel polarweasel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In order to test that the ignore is working, I suggest making a change to docs/content/latest/admin/yb-ctl.md to make sure it doesn't trigger the CTL checks.

Deleting line 18 (one of two blank lines in a row) would be a great change, since it should be deleted anyway. :)

Can't have both a paths and a paths-ignore entry. Changing to negative syntax for the docs path to be ignored.
@polarweasel polarweasel self-requested a review July 2, 2021 17:36
Copy link
Contributor

@polarweasel polarweasel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me, but I made the last change here, so @iSignal please take a look and merge if it's good with you?

@iSignal
Copy link
Contributor Author

iSignal commented Jul 27, 2021

looks good, thanks for fixing it.

@iSignal iSignal merged commit c90c107 into yugabyte:master Jul 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants