Skip to content

[YQL-16903] Change default value for dq.UseBlockReader and yt.UseRPCReaderInDQ if BlockEngine is enabled #1564

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

nepal
Copy link
Collaborator

@nepal nepal commented Feb 3, 2024

  • [YQL-16903] Change default value for dq.UseBlockReader and yt.UseRPCReaderInDQ if BlockEngine is enabled

Changelog entry

...

Changelog category

  • Experimental feature
  • Improvement
  • Not for changelog (changelog entry is not required)

Additional information

...

@nepal nepal requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2024 19:34
@nepal nepal requested a review from MrLolthe1st February 3, 2024 19:34
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2024

2024-02-03 19:37:48 UTC Pre-commit check for b22a65f has started.
2024-02-03 19:37:51 UTC Build linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo is running...
🟢 2024-02-03 19:40:52 UTC Build successful.
2024-02-03 19:41:05 UTC Tests are running...
🔴 2024-02-03 21:22:15 UTC Some tests failed, follow the links below.

Test history

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
58861 49565 0 1 9265 30

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2024

2024-02-03 19:37:50 UTC Pre-commit check for b22a65f has started.
2024-02-03 19:37:53 UTC Build linux-x86_64-release-asan is running...
🟢 2024-02-03 19:40:38 UTC Build successful.
2024-02-03 19:40:53 UTC Tests are running...
🔴 2024-02-03 21:18:07 UTC Some tests failed, follow the links below.

Test history

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
14528 14401 0 31 62 34

@nepal nepal merged commit 591f564 into ydb-platform:main Feb 5, 2024
@nepal nepal deleted the yql-16903-change-defaults branch February 5, 2024 09:09
@niksaveliev niksaveliev mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2024
@vitstn vitstn mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2024
@starlinskiy starlinskiy mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2024
@vitstn vitstn mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants