fix(display): Update display import

[walterdiaza]

Fix display import for IPython 9.0.0

Description

This PR primarily focuses on updating the display import to support IPython 9.0.0. Previously, we were using:

from IPython.core.display import display

However, this is no longer compatible with IPython 9.0.0. We now import display from:

from IPython.display import display

It's important to note that this module has been used in earlier versions of IPython as well, so this change does not break compatibility with previous releases.

Overall, these updates ensure full compatibility with the latest version of IPython while maintaining support for older versions . All modifications have been tested locally, and the expected behavior remains unchanged.

I appreciate your review and welcome any feedback or suggestions.
Fixes #1708

[fabclmnt]

Hi @walterdiaza ,

thank you for your contribution! It seems like the unit testing is failing, as they need an update to be aligned with the changes that you've made.

Nevertheless, I do have a question - In case users have an older version of IPython installed, would it still work?

[fabclmnt]

Tests update needed

[ssiegel]

Changes to the test notebooks (meteorites.ipynb, titanic.ipynb) are not necessary, they are causing the failures. Reverting them to their original state fixes the issue. And yes, it works for older versions of IPython, the tests running on python<3.11 cover that.

[fabclmnt]

Changes to the test notebooks (meteorites.ipynb, titanic.ipynb) are not necessary, they are causing the failures. Reverting them to their original state fixes the issue. And yes, it works for older versions of IPython, the tests running on python<3.11 cover that.

The tests need to be updated.

Changes to the test notebooks (meteorites.ipynb, titanic.ipynb) are not necessary, they are causing the failures. Reverting them to their original state fixes the issue. And yes, it works for older versions of IPython, the tests running on python<3.11 cover that.

Reverted to the original state or otherwise, the current PR needs to be updated so that the tests don't fail.

@walterdiaza can you please perform the changes?
Otherwise, we will be forced to move forward without your changes, as we expect to have the release launched by tomorrow and I would love to have your contribution completed.