Respond to github solve message

[yamcodes]

Update video section max width to 1024px to prevent stretching.

---

 

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Adjusted the video demo layout: constrained inner container to a fixed 1024px max width and removed extra small-screen horizontal padding for a tighter, more consistent presentation.
• Tests
  • Updated component tests to reflect the revised layout and class expectations.

[cursor]

Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just @cursor in comments and I'll start working on changes in this branch.
_{Learn more about Cursor Agents}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
arkenv	Ready	Preview	Comment	Nov 8, 2025 0:59am

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 729315f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Changed VideoDemo container sizing and small-screen padding: replaced max-w-6xl sm:px-8 with max-w-[1024px] and removed sm:px-8 in component, page, and test updates. No runtime logic or control flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Home page container apps/www/app/(home)/page.tsx	Replaced max-w-6xl with max-w-[1024px] for the VideoDemo container (width constraint changed).
VideoDemo component apps/www/components/page/video-demo.tsx	Removed small-screen horizontal padding class sm:px-8 from the main container; retained other classes.
VideoDemo tests apps/www/components/page/video-demo.test.tsx	Updated expected class list to remove sm:px-8 from the assertion.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagram — changes are purely presentational/CSS with no control-flow or interaction modifications.)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

• Pay attention to:
  • CSS/Tailwind class correctness and intent (max-w-[1024px] vs max-w-6xl).
  • Test assertions matching updated class list.
  • Any incidental layout regressions in responsive breakpoints.

Possibly related PRs

• Refactor VideoDemo component for improved responsiveness and styling #276 — Similar edits removing sm:px-8 and adjusting VideoDemo sizing and tests.
• Fix hero demo #257 — Changes to VideoDemo component and its tests affecting layout classes.
• Update VideoDemo component dimensions and improve layout responsiveness #283 — Modifies VideoDemo container max-width and related test expectations.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through classes with a careful paw,
Trimmed padding small and set the max to 1024,
Pixels aligned and tests passed with grace,
A tidy layout now takes its place. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title 'Respond to github solve message' does not clearly describe the actual changes in the PR. The actual changes involve updating the VideoDemo component's width constraint and removing horizontal padding, but the title suggests a response to some GitHub message without explaining the technical change.	Update the title to accurately reflect the main change, such as 'Update VideoDemo max width to 1024px and remove responsive padding' or similar.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch cursor/respond-to-github-solve-message-c9a4

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25e7cee and 729315f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• apps/www/app/(home)/page.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/www/components/page/video-demo.test.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/www/components/page/video-demo.tsx (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• apps/www/app/(home)/page.tsx

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: test-e2e (a11y)
• GitHub Check: test-e2e (e2e)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

apps/www/components/page/video-demo.test.tsx (1)

236-236: LGTM!

The test expectation correctly reflects the removal of sm:px-8 from the component's container classes.

apps/www/components/page/video-demo.tsx (1)

29-29: No issues found—parent container properly handles layout constraints and padding.

The parent container at apps/www/app/(home)/page.tsx:43 correctly applies max-w-[1024px] and mx-auto, and the main element at line 17 provides px-4 padding on mobile screens (with sm:px-0 on larger viewports). The removal of sm:px-8 from the VideoDemo component is justified—padding is appropriately handled at the parent level.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[yamcodes]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.