Conversation
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@yamcodes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughThe PR replaces the old accessibility test suite with a new smoke test implementation. It deletes Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Test as a11y.test.ts
participant Page as Playwright<br/>Page
participant AxeBuilder as Axe Scanner
participant Utils as a11y.ts Utils
loop For each predefined route
Test->>Page: Navigate to route
Page->>Page: Wait for networkidle
Test->>Test: Verify landmarks (main, nav)
Test->>Test: Verify heading hierarchy (h1-h6)
Test->>Test: Verify page title
Test->>Test: Check skip links (optional)
Test->>AxeBuilder: Create scanner (wcag2a/2aa/21aa)
AxeBuilder->>AxeBuilder: Scan page
Test->>Utils: assertNoA11yViolations(page, options)
Utils->>AxeBuilder: Analyze violations
AxeBuilder-->>Utils: Returns violations list
alt Critical/Serious violations exist
Utils->>Utils: Format violation details
Utils-->>Test: ❌ Throw error
else Moderate/Minor violations not in allowlist
Utils->>Utils: Format unallowed violations
Utils-->>Test: ❌ Throw error with guidance
else All violations allowed
Utils-->>Test: ✓ Pass
end
Test->>Test: Verify keyboard navigation (Tab through)
Test->>Test: Verify global nav presence & links
Test->>Test: Verify semantic HTML elements
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~22 minutes
Possibly related PRsNo directly related PRs identified with strong code-level connections beyond this change. Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/homepage.test.ts (1)
207-221: Consider consolidating duplicated accessibility tests.This test appears to duplicate the homepage accessibility test in
tooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.ts(lines 168-184). Both tests navigate to "/" and run identical accessibility checks with the same disabled rules.Consider one of these approaches:
- Remove this test and rely on the more comprehensive test in
accessibility.test.ts- Keep only this test and remove the one from
accessibility.test.ts- If both are intentionally separate, add a comment explaining why (e.g., one for quick feedback in homepage suite, one for comprehensive accessibility suite)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.ts (1)
186-220: Consider consolidating duplicated docs accessibility tests.This test overlaps significantly with the accessibility tests in
tooling/playwright-www/tests/docs-navigation.test.ts:
- Lines 183-214 test main docs pages (/docs, /docs/quickstart, /docs/examples, /docs/morphs)
- Lines 216-242 test integration pages (/docs/integrations/vscode, /docs/integrations/jetbrains)
The main difference is this test includes additional pages (/docs/how-to/load-environment-variables) and uses slightly different disabled rules.
Consider consolidating into a single comprehensive test location to reduce maintenance burden and test execution time, or document why both test locations are intentionally maintained.
tooling/playwright-www/tests/quickstart.test.ts (1)
183-203: Consider consolidating duplicated quickstart accessibility tests.The /docs/quickstart page is tested for accessibility violations in three different locations:
- Here in
quickstart.test.ts(lines 183-203)docs-navigation.test.ts(lines 183-214, iterates over main docs pages)accessibility.test.ts(lines 186-220, iterates over all docs pages)All three use the same or similar disabled rules.
Consider consolidating to reduce duplication and test execution time. If separate tests are intentional (e.g., per-page suite vs. comprehensive suite), add a comment explaining the strategy.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.ts(2 hunks)tooling/playwright-www/tests/docs-navigation.test.ts(2 hunks)tooling/playwright-www/tests/homepage.test.ts(2 hunks)tooling/playwright-www/tests/quickstart.test.ts(2 hunks)tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/accessibility.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.test.ts
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
**/*.test.ts: Place tests alongside source files and use the .test.ts suffix (e.g., create-env.test.ts, types.test.ts, errors.test.ts, utils.test.ts)
Use Vitest's describe/it structure in tests
Test both success and failure cases for environment validation and utilities
Mock process.env to cover different environment scenarios in tests
In tests, save and restore process.env in setup/teardown (beforeEach/afterEach) to avoid leakage between cases
Verify both runtime behavior and TypeScript types in tests
Files:
tooling/playwright-www/tests/docs-navigation.test.tstooling/playwright-www/tests/homepage.test.tstooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.tstooling/playwright-www/tests/quickstart.test.ts
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: yamcodes/arkenv PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.test.ts : Test both success and failure cases for environment validation and utilities
Applied to files:
tooling/playwright-www/tests/docs-navigation.test.tstooling/playwright-www/tests/homepage.test.tstooling/playwright-www/tests/quickstart.test.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: yamcodes/arkenv PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.test.ts : Verify both runtime behavior and TypeScript types in tests
Applied to files:
tooling/playwright-www/tests/quickstart.test.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: yamcodes/arkenv PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.test.ts : Use Vitest's describe/it structure in tests
Applied to files:
tooling/playwright-www/tests/quickstart.test.ts
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/docs-navigation.test.ts (1)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/accessibility.ts (1)
assertNoAccessibilityViolations(49-114)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/homepage.test.ts (1)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/accessibility.ts (1)
assertNoAccessibilityViolations(49-114)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.ts (1)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/accessibility.ts (1)
assertNoAccessibilityViolations(49-114)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/quickstart.test.ts (1)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/accessibility.ts (1)
assertNoAccessibilityViolations(49-114)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: test-e2e
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/accessibility.ts (3)
4-13: LGTM! Well-defined interface with clear documentation.The
AxeScanOptionsinterface provides a clean API for configuring accessibility scans with sensible defaults and clear documentation.
20-38: LGTM! Clear formatting helper.The violation formatting logic provides helpful error messages with impact levels and node details.
49-114: LGTM! Solid implementation with appropriate violation gating.The function correctly separates critical/serious violations (which always fail) from moderate/minor violations (which can be explicitly allowed). The logic flow is clear and the error messages are helpful.
tooling/playwright-www/tests/homepage.test.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM! Correct import of accessibility utility.tooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM! Correct import of accessibility utility.tooling/playwright-www/tests/quickstart.test.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM! Correct import of accessibility utility.tooling/playwright-www/tests/docs-navigation.test.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Correct import of accessibility utility.
216-242: LGTM! Appropriate rule configuration for integration pages.The test correctly omits
scrollable-region-focusablefrom the disabled rules for integration pages, likely because these pages have different content structure than docs pages with code blocks.
… Actions workflow configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is the final PR Bugbot will review for you during this billing cycle
Your free Bugbot reviews will reset on December 26
Details
You are on the Bugbot Free tier. On this plan, Bugbot will review limited PRs each billing cycle.
To receive Bugbot reviews on all of your PRs, visit the Cursor dashboard to activate Pro and start your 14-day free trial.
…ject. This includes deleting the accessibility test files for the homepage, documentation, and quickstart pages, as well as the utility functions used for accessibility assertions.
… 16 to 18 minutes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)tooling/playwright-www/tests/a11y.test.ts(1 hunks)tooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.ts(0 hunks)tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/a11y.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- tooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.test.ts
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
**/*.test.ts: Place tests alongside source files and use the .test.ts suffix (e.g., create-env.test.ts, types.test.ts, errors.test.ts, utils.test.ts)
Use Vitest's describe/it structure in tests
Test both success and failure cases for environment validation and utilities
Mock process.env to cover different environment scenarios in tests
In tests, save and restore process.env in setup/teardown (beforeEach/afterEach) to avoid leakage between cases
Verify both runtime behavior and TypeScript types in tests
Files:
tooling/playwright-www/tests/a11y.test.ts
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: yamcodes/arkenv PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.test.ts : Test both success and failure cases for environment validation and utilities
Applied to files:
tooling/playwright-www/tests/a11y.test.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: yamcodes/arkenv PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-12T06:23:45.463Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.test.ts : Verify both runtime behavior and TypeScript types in tests
Applied to files:
tooling/playwright-www/tests/a11y.test.ts
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/a11y.ts (1)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/accessibility.test.ts (7)
test(5-288)page(167-191)page(206-258)violation(184-186)violation(176-176)page(148-165)page(193-204)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/a11y.test.ts (1)
tooling/playwright-www/tests/utils/a11y.ts (1)
assertNoA11yViolations(49-114)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: test-e2e
…rt for violations without impact ratings, ensuring they are treated as failures unless explicitly allowed. Updated ImpactLevel type to include null and undefined.
Closes #55
Note, before merging, we MUST create tickets for each TODO that we have here.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Chores