Skip to content

Conversation

davidlion
Copy link
Member

@davidlion davidlion commented Jul 16, 2025

Description

Previously, the boost::process unit test used a timeout of 10ms when running an async process. This timeout seems to occasionally cause failures on macos-15 runners.

Examples:

Checklist

  • The PR satisfies the contribution guidelines.
  • This is a breaking change and that has been indicated in the PR title, OR this isn't a
    breaking change.
  • Necessary docs have been updated, OR no docs need to be updated.

Validation performed

Reran CI multiple times in my fork: https://github.com/davidlion/yscope-dev-utils/actions/runs/16310547059

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Improved reliability of process handling in tests by removing fixed wait times and ensuring completion before proceeding.

@davidlion davidlion requested a review from a team as a code owner July 16, 2025 04:51
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The test_process function in the Boost test suite was updated to remove the use of fixed-duration timed waits. The function now runs the io_context until all work is complete and blocks indefinitely waiting for the process completion, simplifying the control flow.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
taskfiles/boost/test_boost.cpp Modified test_process to remove timed waits, running io_context to completion and blocking indefinitely on the process future.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af9e1b0 and d84f068.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • taskfiles/boost/test_boost.cpp (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,tpp,ts,tsx}

Instructions used from:

Sources:
⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

🔇 Additional comments (1)
taskfiles/boost/test_boost.cpp (1)

109-110: LGTM! Improved CI reliability by removing timeout.

The change from timed waits to indefinite waits is correct and aligns perfectly with the PR objective of preventing timeout-related failures on slower CI runners. The simplified approach of running io_context.run() until completion followed by result.wait() is more robust and easier to understand.

Since the test executes --help on the current executable, the risk of indefinite hanging is minimal while providing better reliability in CI environments.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@davidlion davidlion requested a review from kirkrodrigues July 16, 2025 04:54
@davidlion davidlion merged commit 15df087 into y-scope:main Jul 16, 2025
8 checks passed
@davidlion davidlion deleted the macos-failure branch July 16, 2025 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants